NET Cancer Forums: frighteningly good or good at frightening?


Young-woman-with-computer-worried

OPINION

When I was diagnosed, I was happy with my own research and kept away from forums on the advice of a fellow patient who said they can be negative. Just before my second major operation in 2011, I decided to take the plunge and registered with an online web forum (not a Facebook one). Looking back to that period, I wasn’t really a major player, more of a ‘lurker’. I found it quite ‘cliquey’ and I should have listened to the initial advice of that fellow patient!  So I left it.

Joining Forums

In 2014, I joined several large Facebook closed groups which function as forums. After 4 years, I felt more experienced and knowledgeable and I wanted to learn more about the disease to help with my blog activity.

Be prepared!

I really was not prepared for what I found in these groups. It seemed many people were in a much worse condition than me (I now know this to be incorrect) and I was shocked by some of the things I read (and saw) and I considered leaving pretty sharpish – quite frankly, the content of these forums was stressing me out!

Remember, forums don’t represent the whole NET Patient population

It suddenly became obvious to me that the actual ratios found on forum sites do not equate on the outside, i.e. even on the bigger forums of 2000+ this is not a good representation of the NET patient community when you consider there must be well over 500,000 patients worldwide. For example, on forums, it often appears that everyone has some form of ‘syndrome‘ when in actual fact the ratios are much much lower. If you agree with the logic above, this forum ratio of patients is a particularly relevant point for new forum members who, upon joining, will suddenly find that every symptom in existence seems to be continuously (and repeatedly) associated with the disease, causing further distress.  If you think about it, on a forum, more people are likely to say “yes I have that problem” than “no I don’t have that problem” in response to any question. Regardless of how bizarre or outlandish the question is, someone will nearly always respond saying they also have that issue ……. cue epidemic.  This can unfortunately make it seem more prevalent than it actually is. Perhaps more patients should say “no, not me” to prevent these frequent perceptions and misunderstandings.

Diagnosing the Undiagnosed

There are also many ‘undiagnosed’ people on forums searching for clues for their long-standing illnesses. This isn’t surprising as Neuroendocrine Cancers are notoriously misdiagnosed as routine ailments, in some cases for years. I guess the ‘power of the internet’ leads these people to forums.  These cases tend to come and go and you can almost sense the frustration of those who believe they have NETs but are not yet medically diagnosed with any illness. I really feel for someone with any illness that cannot be pinned down. I feel helpless that I’m unable to wave a magic wand. However, I can’t help feeling that some might be convincing themselves they have Neuroendocrine Cancer by what they read, or perhaps have even been nudged (further) into this belief by their well-meaning audiences who, like me, are simply trying to help?  Only my opinion.

Be prepared for toilet conversations

A much discussed topic and sometimes not for the very squeamish.  I’ve seen some unusual pictures on forums but the worst by far was one of someone’s faeces.  I struggled to understand why anyone would post that – moreover, I was amazed the site administrators allowed it.  No thank you!

Be prepared for God conversations

There is a lot of spiritual and religious content on certain forum sites. I’m not a religious person but I totally respect that many people are. However, on some forums, there is a very heavy religious and spiritual message presence and this may not be everyone’s cup of tea.

Be prepared for strange behaviours

One of the most hideous aspects of forums is the appearance of ‘on-line bullying’ or arguments which happen now and then. Be prepared to see disagreements and many ‘one to ones’ or ‘one to manys’.  However, definition is important here. Cliques of core users can appear overpowering particularly when someone disagrees with one of the ‘clique’. All this is going to do is to drive people away and make people more reluctant to ask or answer a question for fear of upsetting someone or being ridiculed. If you want a very wide-ranging set of opinions on very basic NET information – join a forum! Nothing is a myth, everything is possible. The vast majority of forums I’ve been on, have little or no moderation and inadequate or untimely policing. A well-administered site will deal with it quickly and have round the clock moderation given the international nature of many forums. Administrators need to stamp on this sort of behaviour when it happens and not 36 hours after the event.  I recently left one UK online web forum after very politely suggesting a different opinion to the ‘reigning clique’ which resulted in a coordinated and personal tirade against me (i.e. online bullying).  The posts were removed (indicating the administrators agreed with my complaint). Amazingly some of the ‘reigning clique’ followed me to another forum and continued their personal attacks (again posts were removed when I complained).   My advice is not to join an unmoderated forum and if you see this type of issue and sense they are not being resolved quickly, you should consider leaving that forum to prevent unnecessary stress. In another but different example of bullying, I was blocked from one US site without notice or reason and to this day I have never found out why, despite trying very hard (…..although I suspect ‘politics’).

Be prepared for masses of ‘tat’

Another area which puts me off most NET forums is the masses of ‘memes’, pictures, quotes, miracle ‘snake oil’ cures/medical myths and stuff you see plastered all over the internet – these things are the ‘junk mail/spam’ equivalent on Facebook and some can also be a security problem. I’m very surprised the administrators allow so many of them as they clog up the timeline making it easy to miss an important post and they can present security risks for those who click on them.  I get enough of this on my personal Facebook – no thanks!

Be prepared for fake healthcare news, celebrity fad diets, miracles cures

Social media including patient forums is a targeted medium for those who wish to spread fake, unscientifically proven, believable and solicited news and articles, in many cases to sell a product, i.e. a book, a video, a celebrity diet or product.  Some of this information may result in harm to some patients. Very often, administrators of forums lack the knowledge and initiative to prevent these posts making it to their communities. In many cases, this (mis)information will be shared by another patient or family member who may just be well-meaning but has fallen for the trap set by the purveyor of this clap-trap. This can lead to great upset or fear for those already in a delicate state. Check out my 3 articles on the subject:

Part 1 – Fake News
Part 2 – Alternative Therapy – what’s the harm
Part 3 – Miracle Cures

Be prepared for masses of black and white striped animals

I don’t do zebras, I’d rather talk about people and the things that actually matter.  I therefore find myself strongly objecting to being described as a ‘Zebra’ and part of a ‘herd’.  As soon as I sense a ‘zebra infested’ site, I’m off straight away.  The NET community sometimes appears so infatuated by this aged, out of date, and misleading analogy, that it denies the correct level of support to those who are asking for help.  For example, side by side, a post (say) where someone is asking about side effects of a treatment or how to improve quality of life, or someone just asking for help, is likely to get much less views/likes/comments than a picture of a Zebra …… that is not right.

The strange thing is that in contextual terms, the zebra represents the disease, so when someone says “I am a zebra”, this is in effect saying “I am a disease” or when they say “Dear Zebras” they are saying “Dear Diseases” or my pet hate “Dear Fellow Diseases”. The problem is that the NET community has become “too cute” with the term and it now lacks any ‘kerb appeal’ to the outside world (who should be the key recipients of awareness messages). It’s really holding back NET Cancer external awareness and is a PR disaster area. Even NET specialists are denouncing this infatuation by saying “‘we’re beyond that now”.

I have my own strategy for spreading awareness which seems to be well received and more understandable to EXTERNAL audiences and many NET patients. Moreover, my awareness strategy covers a much bigger spectrum than offered by the narrow and blinkered diagnostic messages inferred by this aged, totally useless and often misquoted equine analogy. I say Let’s stop dehumanising NET patients.

And, by the way, NET Cancer is not as rare as we keep being told.

Don’t let forums be your life

I’ve recently cut down my membership of groups, not only because they were not a good fit for me but because forums were taking over my life!  I found a lot of the content was making me depressed, mostly due to all the issues outlined above. So, I’ve left most groups, remaining in those which fit my requirements.  I advise you to do similar if you value your sanity.

So …………….

Are forums ‘frighteningly good’?

There can be a lot of positive outputs from many forums and to be truthful, I have learned a lot and made some online friends too.  I’m sure the forums are very useful for some people who are able to prioritise and filter to take what they want from the sites. Some people also use them as a lifeline due to a lack of support in their local area. In that respect, they are frighteningly good.

Are forums good at ‘frightening’?  

Yes, they can be good at frightening for those already in an anxious or delicate state or who want to discuss issues in a slow, deliberate and non-confrontational manner without being inundated with tat, myths, abuse, etc as per above.  I like to help people but for the first couple of months after joining, I found myself feeling totally helpless with the sheer number and range of problems.  Unfortunately, well-meaning people give totally different and dangerously conflicting answers, even to simple questions. I find this very frustrating even though I learned to prioritise and filter – I just felt bad that the questioner was getting no answer (50 different answers is no answer) or the fundamentally wrong answer. It also infuriates me to see a pathetic response to a cry for help right next to 100 likes for someone’s zebra coloured fingernails.

Summary

I now receive dozens of messages/emails every week but I find myself increasingly hesitant to recommend people I don’t know too much about to certain forums. Don’t get me wrong, I think some forum sites do a great job but they can be pretty frightening places for the unwary (and on occasion…. the wary!).

Thanks for reading

Please note, since writing this article, I have established my own group and my aim is to minimise the issues above as much as possible in order to focus on education with a supporting slant.  You can join my group by answering 2 or 3 simple questions. Click here

Ronny

I’m also active on Facebook.  Like my page for even more news.  I’m also building up this site here: Ronny Allan

Disclaimer

My Diagnosis and Treatment History

Most Popular Posts

Sign up for my twitter newsletter

Read my Cure Magazine contributions

Remember ….. in the war on Neuroendocrine Cancer, let’s not forget to win the battle for better quality of life!

Author: Ronny Allan

Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/NETCancerBlog and https://m.facebook.com/RonnyAllanBlog twitter: @ronnyallan1 twitter: @netcancerblog

24 thoughts on “NET Cancer Forums: frighteningly good or good at frightening?”

  1. Liver biopsy proved a low grade tumor – we are starting off with Sandostatin and seeing how things go. First injection today and if the first few days of short acting go ok then we start the LAR next week. There is this bit of me that just wants them to ‘get it all out’ of her gut – but my understanding is that might just make her a lot sicker than she currently is given the extent of the surgery. I hate seeing her with this horrible intermittent stomach pain – and in comparison to other symptoms people talk about its not something that you see online a lot (people complaining of it). The MDT seems to think that SSA will help – and we are all clinging on to that. Thanks for listening!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks so much for the message and kind words. I do feel confident with our team and yes, bring on the support. It is strange for me to be on the other side of the clinic room after all these years as a specialist one nurse. Also, I’m not particularly experienced with wordpress yet! This is the blog I started before the drama unfolded this week. https://confessionsofacancernurse.wordpress.com Will continue to follow you with interest!

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Hi again. Definite uptake with the Ga68 PET, the known areas had uptake in small int, nodes and liver (both lobes, 3-4 spots). Liver biopsy this week and then (depending on grade) starting SSA. There has been talk of debulking surgery for the gut lesion and node, potentially. Mum is so well right now (except for pretty horrible tummy cramps that come and go). Fingers crossed for a low grade, sleepy tumour.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Most are low grade and reasonably indolent. They’ve probably been growing for sometime if she has mets. Good luck to her with liver biopsy. I hate stomach cramps!

        Like

  3. Hi Ronny, I started my own blog a couple of months ago about my experiences as a cancer nurse. Then, major plot twist, my Mum was diagnosed with neuroendocrine cancer in December. We get results of her GaTate PET today. She is being treated by a NET multidisciplinary team within a cancer centre, which is reassuring. Also of course terrifying. I’ll be giving the ‘forums’ a miss for now – I’ve found your blog really helpful. Cheers.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sorry to hear about your Mum. NETs are very treatable and it’s good that she is being treated at a NET MDT. Grade is very important. Check out my staging and grading post – stage 4 is not normally the big deal it could be with other cancers, this is key information. Ga68 PET can be very sensitive and can sometimes show physiological uptake but hopefully your radiology guys will be experienced. I’ll follow you back, perhaps we can support each other going forward. My Facebook site isn’t a forum and there are many lurkers there avoiding forums. Let me know if you need anything (including which forums to avoid). Good luck and best wishes to your mum.

      Like

  4. I have only recently discovered your blog and find your humor and synthesis of information so helpful! If you are a newly diagnosed carcinoid patient, like me, the forums can be extremely confusing and I will be honest: horrifying! Thanks and keep on writing.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. There is a down side to the forums that no one has mentioned. I couldn’t get on to them I was filltered out for some reason. I managed to get on one then was blocked before I ever posted??? I have heard of others at my hospital having same problem.
    They thought it was because we didn’t have our own blogs. I now have a different problem with face book so that is totally out.

    So please keep up the good work Ronnie as some people can only get blogs. I find yours very interesting because you don’t go over the top about everything. Thanks Ronnie

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I agree with everything you say here. When I need info I am always directed to the forums you discuss. Like you, I felt completely uncomfortable with the tone and horrified that people feel this is the place to deal with such terrible issues.
    Me, well I am 3.5 years in, carcinoid syndrome, had liver resection, primary not found but I must have wee tumours lurking as have symptoms. Symptoms fairly well controlled for now.
    I am determined not to have my disease define me. Getting on with a normalish life. I just have to ” recalibrate for ground level” now and then. I have been very lucky, my work decided to hold on to me and I now work from home, this has been a mental lifesaver, no time for forums and such.😁
    Recently had a discussion with my GP and have told him I will not have every single problem blamed on my cancer. I believe I actually said, it’s not all about tumours you know! I think we had a breakthrough😁
    It’s a pity the original message of using the zebra has been lost, from what you say. I’ve never been a herd type person and not starting now . Well done. Thanks for being honest about this, it’s good to know I’m not crazy, well……! Fx

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I agree with everything you’ve said here. If you only read the patient forums, you would think that there are only about 5 doctors who treat NETS in the US and that most people with this disease are in terrible distress. I also like the distilled information I can get from the forums but need to concentrate my efforts on living my life, not worrying about my cancer all the time.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Ronny, the link to your post is invalid “Read more of this post” has a date in it. 2015/04/16 and it should be 2015/04/11. This has happened once before on your post announcements.. Something wrong with WordPress maybe.

    I found the post and liked it. Yes people assign far too many symptoms to neuroendocrine cancer and yes there are people a lot sicker than me. But I do find it valuable in understanding the human side of our disease.

    Keep up the good work, Cy

    Like

  9. Ronny, I agree with so much of what you’ve said. I removed myself from some yahoo groups early on for some of the issues you note. One of my pet peeves is the explicit endorsement of particular specialists and flagrant disapproval of others. One of their prized specialists told me over the phone (he hadn’t even seen me) that I was inoperable (Which was not true). And while I appreciate some medical professionals participating in patient forums and trying to put some general and accurate information out there, I feel uncomfortable about broadcast posts where doctors respond to specific, individual questions about personal treatment. But, like you, I have also gotten a lot out of some groups and have appreciated the sense of community. One Facebook group manages to maintain a supportive tone and a nice sense of community and I’ve appreciated connections I’ve made there.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Always updated, important information…..like the carcinoid/ echocardiogram for June, 2015 Ronny. I agree about the forums and blogs. Nice to filter unimportant and keep it academic. Same as Dr Liu’s website. Keep up the good work!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Could either of you (Ronny or Jean) share how to locate these forums and closed groups? I’m hunting but not finding anything. I hate this isolated feeling of “it’s rare” and good luck. I am in your boat Ronny, I’m more interested in hearing what others have tried and had success with, whose doctors “get it” and meet people who can relate because right now I’m just surrounded by well intentioned people who love me but really are clueless.

      Thanks!
      Sarah

      Liked by 1 person

Thanks for the comment, make sure you have ticked the box to receive notifications of responses

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.