Translate

Reframing Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Beyond “Rare”

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have outgrown the “rare disease” label. e.g. Across the U.S., UK, and Australia, they now rank among the most commonly diagnosed cancers — yet they remain under-recognised in mainstream healthcare circles, often misdiagnosed in primary and secondary care, but continue to be medically complex requiring specialist input which often arrives late. 

The Global Reality – examples

CountryStatus
🇺🇸 United States
No longer qualifies as an orphan disease
— prevalence now exceeds 243,000 cases. The FDA’s own phrasing—“orphan status to drugs and biologics for rare diseases that meet certain criteria”—makes it clear that “rare disease” is the qualifying condition, and the numerical threshold (<200,000 people in the U.S.) is the defining criterion for that designation.
🇬🇧 United Kingdom10th most common cancer in England, with a 371% rise in incidence since 1995
🇦🇺 Australia
7th most prevalent cancer
, affecting more people than ovarian, kidney, or liver cancer
 

These figures reflect improved diagnostics, rising awareness, and longer survival (thus the prevalance figures) — but they also expose a critical gap: prevalence has increased, but understanding has not appeared to keep up.  Some of  you might add that more specialist centres are needed and this is certainly true in many countries. 

 

Why “Rare” No Longer Fits

  • Outdated metaphors like “zebra” obscure the biological complexity and diversity of NENs. Many patients are furious about this focus. We are beyond that now and have been for some time. 

  • Delayed diagnoses remain common, despite growing case numbers. If we keep telling people it’s rare, they won’t think of it. 

  • Specialist care is still limited in many countries, even as patient populations grow.

 

What We Should Say Instead (examples)

Old FramingUpdated Messaging


“NENs are rare cancers”

“NENs are under-recognised and biologically complex”
“We’re zebras”
“We’re uncommon but not rare — not easily boxed, not easily ignored”  In any case, as the archaic term ‘zebra’ means a diagnosis rather than a person, who would use the term “We’re diagnoses” in any context!  Let’s stop degrading awarness impact with old and outdated thinking. 

“Rare = forgotten”
“Common enough to matter, complex enough to demand expertise”
 

Why This Matters for Advocacy

  1. Regulatory shifts: e.g. In the U.S. NENs no longer qualify for orphan drug incentives (on paper) — changing the landscape for research and drug development. While we enjoy legacy programmes, we now need to exploit the mainstream use of visibility to attract funding, and commercial interest.  To be honest, we have made huge advantages in this area with many new products approved and even more in the pipeline. 

  2. Policy and funding: As prevalence grows, so must investment in specialist care, registries, and education. There are advantages of becoming more prevalent
    a. Increased Research and Funding Opportunities
    • Public and private funders are more likely to invest in diseases with broader impact.
    • Larger patient populations justify more robust clinical trials and basic science research.
    b. Greater Commercial Interest
    • Pharmaceutical and biotech companies are more likely to invest in drug development when the potential market is larger.
    • This can lead to more treatment options, including competing therapies that drive innovation and pricing pressure.
    c. Improved Diagnostic Awareness
    • More common diseases are better recognised by clinicians, reducing diagnostic delay.
    • Screening programs and clinical guidelines are more likely to include them.
    d. Stronger Patient Advocacy and Policy Influence
    • Larger patient communities can mobilise more effectively, influencing policy, reimbursement, and research priorities.
    • Media coverage and public awareness tend to increase.
    e. Integration into Mainstream Care
    • Diseases that are no longer rare are more likely to be included in medical curricula, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) prompts, and national cancer strategies.
    • This leads to earlier diagnosis, better care pathways, and multidisciplinary support. e.g. Neuroendocrine Cancer UK is already working witrh the NHS on a NEN pathway. 

  3. Awareness campaigns: It’s time to move from “rare disease” sympathy to more mainstream and scientific approches including the need for enhanced precision medicine urgency (this is already a work in progress).

Awareness Messaging Ideas

  1. “Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: No Longer Rare. Still Misunderstood.” Emphasises the shift in prevalence while keeping the focus on awareness gaps.
  2. “It’s Time for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Common, Complex, Heterogenous and Still Overlooked.” 
  3. “From Rare to Recognised — But Still Not Resolved.” 
  4. “Forget the Stripes. Focus on the Science of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.” Black and white is not a cure. We need more research and less gimmicks. We’re in the big league now. 
  5. “Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Are Rising. So Must Awareness.” See 4.
  6. “Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: More Common Than You Think. More Complex Than You Know.” —We need more education tools in line with 1-5 above and less gimmicks. 
Today – the following figure is the total number of views of my blog! Can you help me get to 3 million?
  • 2,833,791 views
Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 27.4K other subscribers

Disclaimer

I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me. 

Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional. Some content may be generated by AI which can sometimes be misinterpreted.  Please check any references attached.    

Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.

Buy me a cup of tea or two

Buy me a cup of tea or two? Change the number below to increment. i.e insert 2 = £8, 3 = £12, etc

Overheads to run this site, e.g. software packages, domain registration fees, software tools, misc items. Donate £4 or more so I have the fuel to keep on providing great content!

£4.00

Click picture to browse my blog

Discover more from Ronny Allan - Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Ronny Allan - Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.