Don’t worry, it’s benign!

Don’t worry, it’s benign!

One of the most controversial aspects of Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) is the ‘benign vs malignant’ question. It’s been widely debated, and it frequently patrols the various patient forums and other social media platforms. It raises emotions and it triggers many responses ….. at least from those willing to engage in the conversation. At best, this issue can cause confusion, at worst, it might contradict what new patients have been told by their physicians (….or not been told). This post will not cover Neuroendocrine Carcinoma which by standard cancer nomenclature definition is malignant. Any standard cancer nomenclature definition of the word…
Read More
Let’s be clear about Neuroendocrine Tumours – it’s a cancer!

Let’s be clear about Neuroendocrine Tumours – it’s a cancer!

Dear Readers Another week and another discussion about 'benign vs malignant' in my group. Let's put that into context and dispel one big myth. I write many blogs but one thing I always emphasise is the heterogenous nature of something called Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. That is a 'catch-all' term for both well differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET) and poorly differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC). Notwithstanding the fact that there is a Grade 3 NET nowadays, the former is often described as 'slow-growing or 'indolent' in behaviour and the latter is almost always faster growing and a more aggressive cancer. NEC is also frequently…
Read More