Every July, I think back to my diagnosis of advanced Neuroendocrine Cancer in 2010. I guess one of the reasons I do this is to be thankful that I’m still alive but also, I have a sneaking suspicion that I’m still trying to remember small detail from that period. It had felt surreal ever since 8th July when the secondary care investigating doctor sent me for a CT scan leading to a biopsy on 19th July.
That scan was to uncover some shocking detail of what had been going on inside my body, with no grand announcement, just something chipping away over the years. My diagnostic triggers were incidental in many ways and a reaction to me telling a GP Nurse that I thought I’d lost a bit of weight. I still feel lucky that the Nurse thought to investigate further.
Scans are great at detecting abnormalities but alone they normally cannot tell which type of cancer you have. But they very often are the trigger for completing a diagnosis by narrowing down the list of possibilities by enabling focus. Nonetheless, the wording of my very first CT scan was worrisome. It’s worth remembering that radiologists report what they see, they are not normally there to formally diagnose, although their input is totally key to the investigations. As they are doctors, they can suggest possibilities using their own experience. As you know many NET primaries are hard to see and small intestine NETs can often be particularly difficult.
However, and I say this in hindsight, if I read someone else’s diagnostic scan today and read “mass in the root of the mesentery”, I would immediately be suspicious of that being a small intestine NET case as that is a common presentation for this type of NET. And that is exactly what it said on my very first diagnostic scan completed on 8th July 2010 even though the “bowel” was said to appear normal (along with the pancreas, kidneys, spleen, lungs and mediastinum).
The radiologist also confirmed I had at least 6 enhancing lesions on my liver measuring up to 6cm and that they were not typical of hemangiomas (benign lesions). One of the most worrying additions to the report was the “abnormal rind of tissue surrounding the aorta extending distally from below the renal vessels”. That was pretty scary to me at the time as I knew the aorta was a critical blood vessel. This issue was later described as retroperitoneal fibrosis. It still worries me today and is covered by this article – click here.
As if I didn’t have enough jigsaw pieces to play with, I had a concurrent issue going on prior to my diagnosis. I was seeing doctors about a hydrocele, and I had an appointment to repair that on 15th July 2010 but that plan was interrupted by my NET discovery and subsequent treatment. I eventually got that hydrocele repaired in Sep 2011. However, the radiologists picked up this hydrocele on 8th July and suggested the possibility of a teratoma without realising my doctors had discounted this possibility. I don’t have an issue with the suggestion, the radiologist was being thorough. I wrote about this issue – read more by clicking here.
The radiologist also mentioned “extensive lymphadenopathy” (swollen lymph nodes) and suggested my presentation was “consistent with lymphoma or adenocarcinoma” as a possibility. It was neither in the end (note: lymphoma can also present in the small intestine – who knew!). Despite the usefulness of scans, “tissue is the issue”, and I was to have a biopsy on the liver on 19th July. Prior to the biopsy, they had no inkling the biopsy would confirm a NET thus why no nuclear imaging specific to NET was suggested at this point. Clearly, it was something I eventually got done. The CT scan summarised that “there was almost certainly malignant disease surrounding the aorta, in the root of the mesentery and scattered throughout the liver”. Two out of three were correct, the retroperitoneal fibrosis surrounding the aorta was later found to be benign tissue (thankfully) but I can honestly say that issue scares me more than the NET as it’s not just about malignancy, it’s also about a serious threat to key vessels. That threat still lingers today.
After the scan, I got a gazillion blood tests. Bearing in mind they had no idea this was a NET case, I did not get Chromogranin A or 5HIAA at this point, this was to come later.
None of the above can be considered a misdiagnosis, it is a normal clinical practice to look at the differentials ahead of collecting tissue. The biopsy took place on 19th of July, and I had a terrible time throughout the procedure with pain and general discomfort plus some anxiety. The interventional radiologist took 3 core biopsies from my largest liver tumour. I had mild anesthesia administered and at the time, I (or they) did not know I had carcinoid syndrome, which was to be found out later. I’ll never find out if there was a connection with my very uncomfortable biopsy and my carcinoid syndrome, so I try to put that to the back of my mind. Five days later and 48 hours before my Oncologist meeting, there was an incident that led me to be admitted to A&E (ER) but you can read about that in “48 hours before diagnosis” (click here).
I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me. Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional as they are not members of the private group or followers of my sites in any official capacity. Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.
Top 10 Posts & Pages in the last 48 hours (auto updates) (Click the titles to read them)
Thanks for reading.
I’m also active on Facebook. Like my page for even more news. Help me build up my new site here – click here and ‘Like’
Sign up for my newsletters – Click Here
My Diagnosis and Treatment History
Check out my online presentations
Check out my WEGO Health Awards
Like my new awareness page – click here or on the photo. (Like rather than follow please!)
Check out my Glossary of Terms – click here
Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient
Pancreatic NET with carcinoid syndrome – not as common as you think
Why do I need to write about this? I’ve been watching confusion surrounding symptomatic pancreatic NETs for years and it never ceases to amaze me
A spotlight on Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
What are Appendiceal NENs Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplams (NENs) account for approximately 60% of all primary cancers in the appendix. The other main cancer types found
Nuclidium wins award to study NET radiopharmaceutical – Phase 1 Clinical Trial of TraceNET (TM)
What is TraceNETTM TraceNETTM is a a novel copper-based ‘radiodiagnostic’ for detecting neuroendocrine tumours (NET). The PET imaging agent candidate is the diagnostic component of
Experimental drug for Gastric NET – Netazepide
Gastric NETs When I wrote my post entitled “Spotlight on Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms“, I explained what these were with some emphasis on the association with
A Newsletter from RonnyAllan.NET – 13th March 2023
Newsletter from Ronny Allan – 13th March 2023 Welcome to my new template newsletter compiled using WordPress (my blog app). This is the 2nd in
Fructose intolerance – the NET Effect
Background When I cast my mind back to my very first surgery, I remember all sorts of ‘plumbing’ issues but was told it would take
A tribute to the life and legacy of Miranda Filmer
It’s true to say that Neuroendocrine Cancer is an older person’s disease, the epidemiology is clear on that. But I do see many young people
Treatment for Neuroendocrine Cancer: Beware of the alternatives
The Alternative Hype Cancer Research UK warns of the risks in Alternative Therapies, and I pay great attention to what these guys say. I know
RonnyAllan.NET – Summary of February 2023 – Ronny Allan – Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer
Summary Another great start to 2023 and I thank those who continue to support my social media and this blog. I’m keen to hear any
3 thoughts on “Neuroendocrine Cancer: diagnostic dilemmas in July 2010”
Every time I read your blog I get the most information. I am so grateful for your dedication to education and advocacy. Once again, thank you Ronny 🙂
Anniversary awareness does occupy one’s mind. For me, this July.I’d the year anniversary of my lanreotide injections.( my 13th is due this afternoon.)
My other anniversary will be Nov 13th- 5 years after my pancreatic cancer operation.