The trouble with the NET (Part 5) – Cancer Diet Myths

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 14.2K other subscribers

Certain popular ideas about how cancer starts and spreads – though scientifically wrong, can seem to make sense, especially when those ideas are rooted in old theories. To a certain extent, it can be the case with treatment too. But wrong ideas about cancer can lead to needless worry and even hinder good prevention and treatment decisions.  Even food and nutritional supplements fall into this area

Common dietary myths

There are numerous (alleged) ‘anti-cancer’ diets and foods in the media and on the internet but some of the most common ones are highlighted in the section below. 

This summary cannot cover all dietary myths that you may encounter but it could be helpful to try empowering fellow patients to question the credibility of the diet claims they are coming across. The tips below can help you guide a fellow patient to check the credibility of a diet claim:

  1. Check the source – reputable sources can be medical journals, a reputable cancer charity, health professionals.
  2. What is the evidence for the diet based on? Large population intervention studies on people with cancer would be a good basis for a reputable diet.
  3. Is the diet being sold? Be careful if dietary products are being sold – the profit rather than science may be driving any health claims.
  4. Diets highlighting only eating a few foods are unlikely to be balanced or healthy and may do damage overall.

In one study, a surprising 40% of Americans believe cancer can be cured solely through alternative therapies, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)’s second annual National Cancer Opinion Survey.  In a similar study in UK, the NHS blamed social media for the spread of fake healthcare news. 

These surveys are not surprising as social media ‘misinformation’ includes ‘alleged’ cures for various ailments including cancer extending to the use of “food” and “food supplements”.  I think we’ve all been there, we check twitter, Facebook, Pinterest etc and we find the ubiquitous miracle cures and claims for every illness under the sun.  Easy to find, easy to read and worryingly, easy to share.  Surely these cures must be true, after all…’s on the ‘NET’.

Has wide access to the internet exacerbated this problem? 

The rise of the (Inter)NET has allowed people to use ‘social technology’ to help shape the world’s events and culture. Additionally, the NET has increased the speed of how relationships develop, the way information is shared and (whether you like it or not) how influence can be leveraged for gain.  Facebook has taught us new ways to communicate and collaborate through features like feeds, profiles and groups. At the same time, smartphones and tablets provide mobile and instantaneous access to information from any location.  Whether you like it or not, we are witnessing the power of social media and its effect on society. However, the ‘NET’ can also provide ‘misinformation’ and it’s REALLY GOOD at it. 

This problem also appears in cancer support communities and the list below is some of the most common (but not all) claims I witness in patient groups.

Below, I have provided links to trustworthy sources to counter what I see on some of the comments I see in patient groups and within the NET community generally.  Good group moderation should prevent these claims from being widely shared to vulnerable people. 


The biggest myth you will find on the internet.  Much of the confusion stems from the fact that the most common PET scan used in cancer uses ‘sugar’ based tracers to find cancer – not as simple as that!  And while research has shown that cancer cells consume more sugar (glucose) than normal cells, no studies have shown that eating sugar will make your cancer worse or that, if you stop eating sugar, your cancer will shrink or disappear.  It’s also worth noting that every cell in our body uses sugar to function, for example, the body uses sugars and starches from carbohydrates to supply glucose to the brain and provide energy to cells around the body.

This doesn’t mean you should eat a high-sugar diet, though. Consuming too many calories from sugary foods has been linked to weight gain, obesity, and diabetes, which increase the risk of developing cancer and other health problems.  Read more on Cancer Research UK

Green tea and matcha (powdered green tea) 

Green tea and matcha (powdered green tea) do not reduce the risk of cancer.  Some people have suggested that green tea might reduce the risk of cancer. This is because it contains catechin – an antioxidant that seems to stop tumour growth in rats. But results from large studies have not shown that green tea reduces the risk of cancer in humans.

Read more on Cancer Research UK and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Vitamin, mineral and herb supplements (nutritional supplements)

Due to the side effects of Neuroendocrine Tumours, in particular surgery, many NET patients might be advised to take nutritional supplements

There is no reliable evidence that dietary or nutritional supplements can prevent, cure or control the growth of cancer. However, you might need to have dietary supplements if you have low levels of particular nutrients.  Or, your cancer might stop you from easily absorbing nutrients from your food. So your doctor might prescribe nutritional supplements.  Always check with your specialist before you take any supplements to make sure they won’t interfere with any cancer treatment you are having (including surgery). 

Read more on Cancer Research UK

Essiac therapy/Essiac tea

Essiac is a herbal remedy from Canada.  It has 4 ingredients: burdock root, sheep sorrel, slippery elm, Indian Rhubarb root.  A modified Essiac product called Flor Essence also includes watercress, blessed thistle, red clover, kelp.

There is no scientific evidence to support its use as a treatment for cancer.

Read more on Cancer Research UK

Dandelion tea/root extract

There’s a lot online about dandelion tea but many people associate that with dandelion root extract which is alleged to have anti-cancer properties.  Check full fact evidence by clicking below.

Dandelion root is not a proven cancer cure – Full Fact


Mushrooms are often talked about as a treatment for cancer. There may be some benefits (always seek advice) but there is currently no evidence that any type of mushroom can prevent or cure cancer.

Read more on Cancer Research UK

On well know doctor’s site WebMD, they noted that Reishi mushrooms (much touted by those who sell it) are a bitter-tasting fungus with no proven health benefits. It is thought to have some effects on the immune system. Reishi mushroom is used for Alzheimer disease, cancer, diabetes, and many other conditions, but there is no good scientific evidence to support these uses. They also provided the following warnings:

Reishi mushroom extract is possibly safe when used for up to one year. Powdered whole reishi mushroom is possibly safe when used for up to 16 weeks.

Reishi mushroom can cause dizziness, dry mouth, itching, nausea, stomach upset, and rash.  

There isn’t enough reliable information to know if reishi mushroom is safe to use when pregnant or breast feeding. Stay on the safe side and avoid use. 

High doses of reishi mushroom might increase the risk of bleeding in some people with certain bleeding disorders.

High doses of reishi mushroom might increase the risk of bleeding in some people if used before or during surgery. Stop using reishi mushroom at least 2 weeks before a scheduled surgery.

Read  more on WebMD

Milk thistle

Milk thistle is a plant that comes from the same group of flowers as the daisy. It is not a treatment for cancer.


  • The medicinal compound in milk thistle is silymarin, an extract of milk thistle seeds.
  • Milk thistle might help to treat some liver diseases such as hepatitis and cirrhosis.
  • More research is needed before we will know if milk thistle can help prevent or treat cancer.

Read more on Cancer Research UK

Oncolyn (Onculyn in Canada)

Onculyn is a plant-based antioxidant dietary supplement. This supplement has been around for 20 years.  It is not a treatment for cancer.


  • Health Canada recalled this supplement in 2006 with the following reason “Health Hazard Evaluation conducted by NHPD concluded the sale of this product is a Type II health risk due to the health claims for the treatment of cancer which are associated with the product as well as the implied claim of the brand name “Oncolyn”. Furthermore, the product contains undeclared hawthorn extract with no label warnings contraindicating the product’s use by pregnant women, and by those with cardiac conditions and/or taking cardiac drugs.  Branding Note: The nutritional supplement formerly called Oncolyn (with a middle ‘o’) is no longer available for sale in Canada. Onculyn is the Canadian version of this product.
  • Read more on Health Canada

Laetrile (amygdalin or vitamin B17)

You can find this easy on the internet (worryingly).   Many websites promote laetrile as a cure for cancer. But no reputable scientific cancer organisations support any of these claims. Be cautious about believing this type of information or paying for any alternative cancer therapy over the internet. One review by the well known scientific organisation Cochrane said …. “It also found a risk of serious side effects from cyanide poisoning after laetrile or amygdalin, especially after taking it by mouth”

Some people call laetrile vitamin B17, although it isn’t a vitamin.  Some sites sell it as “apricot kernels”.  WebMD, well known scientific evidence based website said “The most obvious reason is that amygdalin can cause cyanide poisoning. Your blood pressure could drop very low, you may damage your liver, or you might go into a coma. In the worst-case scenario, high doses – 50-60 apricot kernels, or 50 grams of Laetrile — can kill you.”

There is no reliable evidence that it works as a cancer treatment – or as a treatment for anything else. It’s not available for sale in the UK or Europe, due to lack of evidence of its effectiveness. 


Cancer Research UK

The Institute of Cancer Research

St. John’s Wort

This popular supplement is a plant native to Europe that has yellow, star-shaped flowers. The supplement tends to be taken to help with mental health conditions like depression. However, St. John’s wort has been associated with potentially serious interactions with certain drugs

Taking St. John’s wort with certain antidepressants can lead to an increase in serotonin levels that can be life threatening (i.e. serotonin syndrome). Symptoms can appear within minutes or hours and can include diarrhea, agitation, fast heartbeat, high blood pressure, and hallucinations.

St. John’s wort can also weaken antidepressants. Other medications that St. John’s wort can weaken include:

  • Birth control pills
  • Cyclosporine (a drug used to prevent the body from rejecting organ transplants)
  • Digoxin (a heart failure medication)
  • Oxycodone (a pain medication)
  • Some HIV drugs, like indinavir
  • Some cancer medications, like irinotecan
  • Warfarin (a blood thinner)

Source US National Institute of Health

Mistletoe (including European Mistletoe)

According to the US National Cancer Institute, Mistletoe is a plant that grows on many types of trees, including apple, oak, maple, elm, pine, and poplar. It has been used for hundreds of years to treat medical conditions such as epilepsy, asthma, hypertension, headaches, menopausal symptoms, infertility, dermatitis, arthritis, and rheumatism.

The US National Institute for Health reported that European mistletoe berries and leaves can cause serious harmful effects when taken orally (by mouth) and that it is probably unsafe for use during pregnancy. Little is known about whether it’s safe for use while breastfeeding and that injected European mistletoe extract may cause soreness and inflammation at the injection site, headache, fever, and chills. A few severe allergic reactions have been reported.  Finally they stated that European mistletoe is not a proven cancer treatment. It should not be used as a treatment for cancer outside of clinical trials.

The US FDA has not approved the use of mistletoe extract as a treatment for cancer or any other medical condition.

There is no scientific evidence this is in any way advantageous as an anti-cancer therapy for Neuroendocrine Cancer. 

Source US National Institute of Health

Ketogenic diet

The ketogenic diet is a low carb, high fat diet commonly used for weight loss. Restricting carbs and increasing fat intake can lead to ketosis, a metabolic state in which your body relies primarily on fat for energy instead of carbs.  Just by reading this bit, I can see some red flags for many patients with NET issues. 

In one of my goto sources for general health information, healthcare professionals indicate that this diet also carries risks you should be aware of and I think this is of use to NET patients.  Read more on Healthline

Carnivore diet

The carnivore diet at its core is extremely restrictive. And when you omit entire food groups from your diet, there’s bound to be consequences. 

“The carnivore diet is super low in fiber, which will cause a lot of constipation,” says Patton. And the risks become much more serious than a failure to poop. 

“If you have a pre-existing chronic condition, like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, any history of stroke or other cardiovascular diseases, you should definitely not try this diet,” Patton says pointedly. “Even if you have digestive issues, this diet can make things worse with all that protein and fat, which takes a lot longer to digest.” 

The carnivore diet is high in saturated fats which can cause elevated LDL or bad cholesterol and put you at risk for heart disease. What’s more, many different kinds of processed meats like bacon and some lunch meats are loaded with sodium and have been linked to certain types of cancer. And a diet high in sodium can cause kidney problems and high blood pressure.

In one of my go to sources for general health information, healthcare professionals indicate this diet carries some big risks.   Read more on Cleveland Clinic.

Gerson therapy

A German doctor called Max Gerson developed Gerson therapy in the 1920s and 30s. He claimed that it helped cure his migraine headaches. So, he went on to use it to treat other diseases such as tuberculosis and cancer.  You might also hear Gerson therapy called the:

  • Gerson diet
  • Gerson regimen
  • Gerson method

Followers believe that changes to diet and nutrient intake can help to treat cancer. They also think that cancer is a symptom of disease of the whole body.  It aims to rid the body of toxins and strengthen the body’s immune system. This way supporters say it can bring the body back to its normal metabolic state, and the body can heal itself.

The Gerson regime has 3 main parts:

  • a strict organic vegetarian diet made up of fruit and vegetables high in potassium and low in sodium
  • vitamin and mineral supplements, and specific enzymes
  • coffee or castor oil enemas

People following the therapy have to eat large quantities of fruit and vegetables. It is believed that by doing so, it will restore the right balance. And that it will cleanse the liver. It is also believed that coffee enemas further help to excrete toxins from the liver and colon. And that taking certain supplements and enzymes help the body to get rid of cancer cells.

Scientific research does not support any of these claims.

Read more on Cancer Research UK

Alternative diets

I only reference two alternative diets here but there are many more that crop up.  But there is no scientific evidence that alternative diets can cure cancer. You can also read about others here, including (but not limited to), alkaline diet, macrobiotic diet, fasting, organic diet, dairy.  Read more on Cancer Research UK.

Cannabis, CBD oil

Many hundreds of scientific papers looking at cannabinoids and cancer have been published so far, but these studies simply haven’t found enough robust scientific evidence to prove that these can safely and effectively treat cancer. In fact some studies say that it can sometimes encourage cancer cells to grow or cause damage to blood vessels. Evidence is emerging that it can help with sickness and pain in some people. 

Cannabis products can be smoked, vaporized, ingested (eating or drinking), absorbed through the skin (in a patch) or as a cream or spray.  CBD oil normally comes as a liquid or in capsules, but edibles are available (e.g. gummies). 

Cannabis that contains high levels of THC can cause panic attacks, hallucinations and paranoia. There are also many cannabis-based products available online without a prescription. The quality of these products can vary. It is impossible to know what substances they might contain. They could potentially be harmful to your health and may be illegal.

Other than where medical cannabis is approved by drug regulatory authorities for prescription use for specified conditions, in many countries, it can be illegal to have, sell or buy cannabis. 

Word of caution

Cannabis is a class B drug and illegal in the UK and other countries.  There are internet scams where people offer to sell cannabis preparations to people with cancer. There is no knowing what the ingredients are in these products, and they could harm your health. Some of these scammers trick cancer patients into buying ‘cannabis oil’ which they then never receive.  It is also possible this could happen in countries where the use of cannabis is legal. 

Placeholder for future additions

Other sources

I like to use Cancer Research UK as a research tool, they take an evidence based approached to stuff so it’s not just “don’t eat this”, they also explain why.  You can search their site for other ‘debunking’ including the frequently shared acidic diet and baking soda myths. 

Cancer Research UK is not alone in trying to help dispel some of these myths, and it’s not just food myths, you can also fact check on the big US site Cancer.Gov – see their myth-busting article here.

I also like the list from Cancer.NET – American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) – read it here.  (Science Fact or Science Fiction).

And if you wanted to hear from one of the world’s most experienced NET dietitians, check out Tara Whyand talking about sugar and KETO:

And the biggest myth of all

Those who push these alternative cures have an agenda.  They will tell you that cancer treatments poison us and make cancer worse.  Cancer is easy to kill. If you put some cancer cells in a dish and pour some bleach on them, they won’t survive for very long. Pouring bleach on some bacteria growing in a petri dish would have much the same effect, but we don’t take bleach when we have an infection, for the same reason we don’t take it when we have cancer.  The reason finding cancer treatments is so hard is because cancer cells are just normal cells which have turned malignant. Anything that kills a cancer cell is therefore likely to kill your own healthy cells as well. The ideal cancer drug is selectively toxic – it will only harm the cancer cells and leave your own cells unscathed.  While older chemotherapy treatments are famously difficult for patients and come with a whole host of nasty side effects, modern research is focused on developing smarter, kinder treatments.  Many of these treatments focus on training your immune system to spot cancer cells and fight them, or therapies which target the genes that have caused the cancer in the first place.  While some older cancer treatments may not be as kind as more modern therapies, they don’t make cancer worse.

They will also tell you that pharmaceutical companies (big pharma) do not want to find a cheap cure because it will mean losing constant streams of revenue.  If this was true, it would be the worst kept secret in the history of humankind.  Modern cynicism and the rise of social media continues to spread this patently false but to many vulnerable people, persuasive claim.  Those who spread this myth will never provide any clear evidence of the huge conspiracy involving tens of thousands of people that would need to be involved in hiding the truth. 

Hope is great, false hope is not.

Click to read more


I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me. 

Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional.   

Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.

“Certain popular ideas about how cancer starts and spreads – though scientifically wrong, can seem to make sense, especially when those ideas are rooted in old theories. To a certain extent, it can be the case with treatment too. But wrong ideas about cancer can lead to needless worry and even hinder good prevention and treatment decisions”

Part 1 – Cancer Myths click here

“Those selling and promoting alternative treatments rarely discuss the risks, especially the biggest risk of all – missing that small window of opportunity to hit a cancer with the best conventional (and proven) treatment possible”

Part 2 – Alternative Therapy risks click here


“But it works… a friend of a friend put it on Facebook”

Part 3 – Miracle Curesclick here

miracle cure banner

“Hope is great, false hope is not”

Part 4 – Cancer Kills but so can Fake Cures – click here

“Hope is great, false hope is not”

Part 6 – The Trouble with the NET – it can spread ……. false hope – click here

This sort of problem also exists within the NET world – read more on common myths here.

Click picture to subscribe

Thanks for reading.


Personal Facebook. Like this page please.
Blog Facebook. Like this page please.
Awareness Facebook Like this page please.

Sign up for my newsletters – Click Here


My Diagnosis and Treatment History

Follow me on twitter

Check out my online presentations

Check out my WEGO Health Awards

Check out my Glossary of Terms – click here

patients included

Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient


Neuroendocrine Cancer Clinical Trial – Lutetium-177Lu (Satoreotide)

What is Satoreotide? It’s an agonist treatment. i.e. a ‘next generation’ radiologand for Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or more specifically the radiopharmaceutical that binds

Read More »

A review of September 2023 on RonnyAllan.NET – Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer

On my website RonnyAllan.NET, September was an interesting month because I had pushed out some blogs before I went on a planned overseas holiday from

Read More »

Never mind the Bollocks – here’s the cancer

I don’t tend to share some very personal stuff, but this is on the boundary of that rule and there are some important messages to

Read More »

First and only FDA-cleared, fully automated chromogranin A assay

There has been controversy about the utility of Chromogranin A for many years now.  Specialists have been critical about its use but to be fair

Read More »

Neuroendocrine Cancer: Question, Clarify, Confirm

One of the many observations I make in my private Neuroendocrine Cancer Facebook group is the misunderstandings caused by the use of non-standard terminology combined

Read More »

Clinical Trial – Lutathera NETTER-2 Important Update

UPDATE – Sep 25th, 2023 – Novartis radioligand therapy Lutathera® demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival in first line advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Read More »
Lanreotide: Ipsen injection devices vs generic injection devices

Lanreotide: Ipsen injection devices vs generic injection devices

Whenever I get a chance to talk to a pharma involved in somatostatin analogue injection devices, I tell them one very important thing …… “To

Read More »

Cancer doesn’t take holidays (but I do)

Glen Etive Scotland in 2018 After diagnosis in July 2010, with the exception of a planned holiday to Turkey prior to my ‘big surgery’, holidays

Read More »

Update from Ronny Allan: No evidence of progressive disease at any site

Update August 2023. Latest CT surveillance scan reports “No evidence of progressive disease at any site”. Very pleased! With incurable but treatable cancers such as

Read More »

A cup of tea

I would also mention those who contributed to my “Tea Fund” which resides on PayPal.  You don’t need a PayPal account as you can select a card but don’t forget to select the number of units first (i.e. 1 = £4, 2 = £8, 3 = £12, and so on), plus further on, tick a button to NOT create a PayPal account if you don’t need one.  Clearly, if you have a PayPal account, the process is much simpler 

Through your generosity, I am able to keep my sites running and provide various services for you.  I have some ideas for 2023 but they are not detailed enough to make announcements yet. 

This screenshot is from every single post on my website and depending on which machine you are using, it will either be top right of the post or at the bottom (my posts are often long, so scroll down!)

3 thoughts on “The trouble with the NET (Part 5) – Cancer Diet Myths

I love comments - feel free!

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights