No matter where you look on social media, there are millions of sites claiming that ‘this’ and ‘that’ can cure cancer. If you analyse some of the things that can apparently ‘cure’ cancer, you will normally find that behind these fantasies, there is someone selling something, a book, a video, a product.
I was also interested to read a number of articles about various aspects of this modern phenomenon. Firstly, in the magazine Wired, a major media company was forced to take down some cancer therapy videos after someone pointed out they were not scientifically factual. Not just patients who get fooled by these claims then?
Much of the misinformation arrives via Facebook, and YouTube, two of the most commonly used social media tools. This article suggests a shockingly large majority of health news shared on Facebook and YouTube is fake or misleading, according to a recent report. This is where bogus treatments have thrived according to the same article. The article also suggests that some of this fake and misleading news makes it to newspapers indicating that editors and health writers are not as robust at fact checking as the readers might expect.
Also worrying is the data from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) which found that 40% of Americans believe alternative treatment can cure cancer (the number was found to be even higher in younger people).
Clearly if that were true, they wouldn’t be alternative treatments, they would be conventional, and we’d all be getting them. Well done ASCO for raising this issue, but let’s not beat up Americans, I very much suspect if other national organisations did similar surveys, they might produce similar results. This astonishing statistic just illustrates the power of social media and the internet in general for spreading this misinformation.
In the UK, the Telegraph ran a story of what can happen if you forego conventional treatment and try alternative instead. This is one example but there are clearly many more and ASCO touched on this above.
“Britton-Jordan was an intelligent woman with a long-standing interest in alternative therapies, who made a decision based on her beliefs. But doctors are becoming increasingly concerned at the targeting of vulnerable cancer patients by charlatans peddling well-meaning but useless therapies– a problem that is gathering pace thanks to the use of social media and drawing parallels with the newly emboldened anti-vaccination movement“.
It’s worrying that people are taken in by such drivel, but we mustn’t forget that people with cancer can often be in a distressed and anxious state and may look to other sources of therapy if they felt the conventional treatment was not working, not available in their healthcare system, or not within their budget/insurance cover (in insurance-based health systems). Of course, this is not helped by the well-intentioned friends and family who get carried away by what they read on the internet and pass it on to their loved ones. Ellie McDowell gives good advice on this card.
In addition to my blog site, I also run a large patient closed group on Facebook and several public pages in support. I can tell you now, I will not allow this sort of fake news and peddling of ‘snake oil’ on any of my sites. My sites are targeted weekly by those who wish to sell their wares, many of them are the sort of thing mentioned in a number of the articles above. They are quickly blocked.
Here’s how to look out for fake healthcare news and products.
Some of the tactics they use (plus a commentary from the US FDA):
One product does it all. Be suspicious of products that claim to cure a wide range of diseases. A New York firm claimed its products marketed as dietary supplements could treat or cure senile dementia, brain atrophy, atherosclerosis, kidney dysfunction, gangrene, depression, osteoarthritis, dysuria, and lung, cervical and prostate cancer. In October 2012, at FDA’s request, U.S. marshals seized these products.
Personal testimonials. Success stories, such as, “It cured my diabetes” or “My tumors are gone,” are easy to make up and are not a substitute for scientific evidence.
Quick fixes. Few diseases or conditions can be treated quickly, even with legitimate products. Beware of language such as, “Lose 30 pounds in 30 days” or “eliminates skin cancer in days.”
“All natural.” Some plants found in nature (such as poisonous mushrooms) can kill when consumed. Moreover, FDA has found numerous products promoted as “all natural” but that contain hidden and dangerously high doses of prescription drug ingredients or even untested active artificial ingredients.
“Miracle cure.” Alarms should go off when you see this claim or others like it such as, “new discovery,” “scientific breakthrough” or “secret ingredient.” If a real cure for a serious disease were discovered, it would be widely reported through the media and prescribed by health professionals—not buried in print ads, TV infomercials or on Internet sites.
Conspiracy theories. Claims like “The pharmaceutical industry and the government are working together to hide information about a miracle cure” are always untrue and unfounded. These statements are used to distract consumers from the obvious, common-sense questions about the so-called miracle cure.
Read more on this issue in an article published by Jack Barrette, CEO and Founder of WEGO Health – “Fake News in Healthcare Can Be Quite Dangerous in Facebook’s Health Communities“. Jack also wrote about how Facebook health communities can protect themselves from these dangers –“For Health Communities, Facebook is Too Important to Delete”.
And also check out this great article from a major UK news outlet – How to survive fake news – click here
I’ve written extensively about these issues before, please check out my other articles on this important subject here:
The Trouble with the ‘NET’ – Cancer Myths – click here
Alternative Therapy risks – click here
Miracle Cures – click here
Hope is great, false hope is not.
“Certain popular ideas about how cancer starts and spreads – though scientifically wrong, can seem to make sense, especially when those ideas are rooted in old theories. To a certain extent, it can be the case with treatment too. But wrong ideas about cancer can lead to needless worry and even hinder good prevention and treatment decisions”
Part 1 – Cancer Myths – click here
“Those selling and promoting alternative treatments rarely discuss the risks, especially the biggest risk of all – missing that small window of opportunity to hit cancer with the best conventional (and proven) treatment possible”
Part 2 – Alternative Therapy risks – click here
“Certain popular ideas about how cancer starts and spreads – though scientifically wrong, can seem to make sense, especially when those ideas are rooted in old theories. To a certain extent, it can be the case with treatment too. But wrong ideas about cancer can lead to needless worry and even hinder good prevention and treatment decisions.”
Part 5 – Food and Diet Myths – click here
The ‘NET’ can spread …….. false hope
Part 6 – The trouble with the NET is that it can spread ……. false hope – click here
Top 10 Posts & Pages in the last 48 hours (auto updates) (Click the titles to read them)
Thanks for reading.
I’m also active on Facebook. Like my page for even more news. Help me build up my new site here – click here and ‘Like’
Sign up for my newsletters – Click Here
My Diagnosis and Treatment History
Check out my online presentations
Check out my WEGO Health Awards
Like my new awareness page – click here or on the photo. (Like rather than follow please!)
Check out my Glossary of Terms – click here
Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient
Pancreatic NET with carcinoid syndrome – not as common as you think
Why do I need to write about this? I’ve been watching confusion surrounding symptomatic pancreatic NETs for years and it never ceases to amaze me
A spotlight on Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
What are Appendiceal NENs Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplams (NENs) account for approximately 60% of all primary cancers in the appendix. The other main cancer types found
Nuclidium wins award to study NET radiopharmaceutical – Phase 1 Clinical Trial of TraceNET (TM)
What is TraceNETTM TraceNETTM is a a novel copper-based ‘radiodiagnostic’ for detecting neuroendocrine tumours (NET). The PET imaging agent candidate is the diagnostic component of
Experimental drug for Gastric NET – Netazepide
Gastric NETs When I wrote my post entitled “Spotlight on Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms“, I explained what these were with some emphasis on the association with
A Newsletter from RonnyAllan.NET – 13th March 2023
Newsletter from Ronny Allan – 13th March 2023 Welcome to my new template newsletter compiled using WordPress (my blog app). This is the 2nd in
Fructose intolerance – the NET Effect
Background When I cast my mind back to my very first surgery, I remember all sorts of ‘plumbing’ issues but was told it would take
A tribute to the life and legacy of Miranda Filmer
It’s true to say that Neuroendocrine Cancer is an older person’s disease, the epidemiology is clear on that. But I do see many young people
Treatment for Neuroendocrine Cancer: Beware of the alternatives
The Alternative Hype Cancer Research UK warns of the risks in Alternative Therapies, and I pay great attention to what these guys say. I know
RonnyAllan.NET – Summary of February 2023 – Ronny Allan – Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer
Summary Another great start to 2023 and I thank those who continue to support my social media and this blog. I’m keen to hear any