Translate
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Ronny Allan
What is Satoreotide?
It’s an agonist treatment. i.e. a ‘next generation’ radiologand for Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or more specifically the radiopharmaceutical that binds to both activated and unactivated somatostatin receptors which are upregulated on these tumours. There is far higher binding via this mechanism than standard octreotate. The technical name of the radiopharmaceutical is Satoreotide tetraxetan lutetium-177 (author’s note, I’m guessing but it could be a variant of Lanreotide).
Somatostatin type 2 (SST2) receptor is overexpressed in many around 80% of NETs, some NEC and in certain hard-to-treat cancers such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and neuroblastoma, an aggressive, rare type of cancer that occurs mainly in young children.
It was once named JR11 when owned by Ipsen (see history below).
The term ‘antagonist’ is important and note that most PRRT in use is ‘agonist’. The differences are quite technical but hopefully, I explained them below.
History
This drug was once owned by Ipsen, but they decided to sell it off. However, in Jun 2022, Ariceum Therapeutics (Ariceum), a private biotech company developing a radiopharmaceutical product for the diagnosis and systemic targeted radiation therapy of certain hard-to-treat cancers, announced the successful investment source of EURO 25 million. The proceeds from the financing will enable Ariceum to further develop its lead asset and proprietary peptide derivative, satoreotide.
It was interesting to note in the JR11 trial that Satoreotide can be used as a ‘theranostic’ for both the diagnosis and treatment of tumours expressing the SST2 receptor. There is evidence of the existence of a Ga68 PET using Satoreotide, knwon as 68Ga-Satoreotide Trizoxetan (SSO120).
In the Ipsen trial, Satoreotide was administered to more than 100 patients including more than 150 therapeutic administrations.
What’s the difference ‘agonist’ and ‘antagonist’?
Conventional beta PRRT (e.g. Lutathera, Lu177 Dotatate) is based on a somatostatin receptor ‘agonist’ approach, whereas 177Lu Satoreotide is a receptor ‘antagonist’. The differences are quite technical but in the most layman terms, the antagonist has the capability of attaching (binding) to more receptors, including those in a ‘resting’ or ‘inactive’ state, spends more time on the tumor than agonist-based therapies. The result is a higher number of receptor binding sites and greater tumor uptake. In addition, it is said to show an improved tumor-to-kidney dose ratio compared to the agonist 177Lu-DOTA-TATE.
This would also be reflected in the theranostic use of the drug in Ga68 imaging (i.e. Ga68 Satoreotide).
Trial Summary (Ariceum)
The existence of the record in my normal source (Clinical Trials dot Gov) is confusing as the original Ipsen trial is there marked as terminated but has been updated in 2023. That said, the clinical trial output in 2023 still quotes the original trial number so it may be that it remains out of date in terms of the usual criteria listed in such documents. I will keep my eye on it being updated.
This announcement from the new owner confirms a new trial is underway managed by the new owners.
This citation below will give you the more detail about the above clinical trial activity.
Wild, D., Grønbæk, H., Navalkissoor, S. et al. A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06383-1
This document also confirms a separate clinical trial for SCLC (technically a form of Lung Neuroendocrine Carcinoma) which is normally treated by Lung MDTs.
I’m still looking for an update on the new clinical trial managed by Ariceum but for information purposes only until I confirm, the original trial locations (or which are showing now) are Australia (Melbourne and Perth), Austria (Vienna), Canada (CHU de Quebec), Denmark (Aarhus), Switzerland (Basel), UK (Royal Free London), France (Nantes and Toulouse), MD Anderson Texas USA.
There is also mention of a site in USA carried out a similar trial at MSK New York where the sponsors reported “In this trial of heavily treated NETs, preliminary data are promising for the use of 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. Additional studies are ongoing to determine optimal therapeutic dose/schedule” – results of the MSK trial were posted here.
Why is this trial important?
Around 20% of NET patients have no or inefficient somatostatin receptors. This type of treatment could open up more access to PRRT for those with insufficient/inefficient receptors.
Read more here
- Original Ipsen clinical trial (information only) – Study Details | Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of 177Lu-OPS201 in NETs | ClinicalTrials.gov
- Trial update of the Ariceum sponsored activity in NETs – Wild, D., Grønbæk, H., Navalkissoor, S. et al. A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06383-1
- Company announcement on NET trial – Ariceum Therapeutics’ targeted radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-satoreotide exhibits promising clinical response and good tolerability profile in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours – Ariceum Therapeutics (ariceum-therapeutics.com)
- Company announcement on SCLC trial – Ariceum Therapeutics doses first patient with its first-in-class targeted radiopharmaceutical drug satoreotide in its Phase Ib study in small cell lung cancer – Ariceum Therapeutics (ariceum-therapeutics.com)
Disclaimer
I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me.
Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional.
Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.
General Clinical Trials Disclaimer
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided in the clinical trials document. It’s very important to check the trial inclusion and exclusion criteria before making any contact. If you need questions, the articles here is very useful Questions to Ask About Clinical Trials | Cancer.Net
The inclusion of any trial within this blog should not be taken as a recommendation by Ronny Allan.
Finally
Whenever I post about a trial or study, some people get excited without understanding that these new treatments and capabilities can very often take years to come to fruition and it’s also possible that clinical trials can be halted, or that national approval agencies will not approve the final product. Plus, not everyone will be eligible, so always check the exclusion and inclusion criteria in the relevant clinical trials document. Please bear that in mind when reading studies/clinical trials posted on RonnyAllan.NET
Top 10 Posts & Pages in the last 48 hours (auto updates) (Click the titles to read them)
Thanks for reading.
Personal Facebook. Like this page please.
Blog Facebook. Like this page please.
Awareness Facebook Like this page please.
Sign up for my newsletters – Click Here
My Diagnosis and Treatment History
Check out my online presentations
Check out my WEGO Health Awards
Check out my Glossary of Terms – click here
Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient

A Spotlight on Neuroendocrine Cancer Syndromes – Carcinoid Syndrome
What is Carcinoid Syndrome? Carcinoid syndrome (CS) is the most frequent hormonal complication accompanying neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and is defined by chronic diarrhoea and/or flushing in the

Somatostatin Receptor Positive Advanced Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumors – PRRT vs Everolimus
I was delighted to see this clinical trial which looks at the efficacy of PRRT (Lu177) vs the efficacy of Everolimus (Afinitor). The latter is

Opinion: Let’s attack Cancer metaphors
Since I started blogging, I’ve read dozens of articles on the subject of ‘cancer metaphors’ and in particular their use in describing cancer experiences with

A review of November 2023 on RonnyAllan.NET – Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer
November is always busier as I help spread awareness for 10th Nov (remembering that every day is 10th Nov on my site!). I also managed

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for Digestive Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides up-to-date and practical advice on the diagnosis and management of digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, based

Neuroendocrine Cancer – Clinical Esoterica
One of the key awareness messages for Neuroendocrine Cancer is the hormonal syndromes that can often accompany the diagnosis for many people. As it’s a

Neuroendocrine Cancer – The F Words
When I first created my blog in April 2014, I had to find some material to lead up to my 84 mile walk (at the

Laughter is the best medicine
Laughter is important. This is a remastered version of one of my early blog posts. It centred on a ‘get-well’ card I received recuperating in

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for gastric neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G1–G3
The ENETS 2023 guideline for gNETs are combined with the guidelines for Duodenal NET (dNET) due to their close relationship in anatomical terms. Gastric neuroendocrine
A cup of tea
I would also mention those who contributed to my “Tea Fund” which resides on PayPal. You don’t need a PayPal account as you can select a card but don’t forget to select the number of units first (i.e. 1 = £4, 2 = £8, 3 = £12, and so on), plus further on, tick a button to NOT create a PayPal account if you don’t need one. Clearly, if you have a PayPal account, the process is much simpler
Through your generosity, I am able to keep my sites running and provide various services for you. I have some ideas for 2023 but they are not detailed enough to make announcements yet.
This screenshot is from every single post on my website and depending on which machine you are using, it will either be top right of the post or at the bottom (my posts are often long, so scroll down!)
How would this compare to mibg therapy?
much more modern tech. mibg mainly for pheochromoctyoma/paraganglioma ?
Wow, haven’t even had the one this is going to supercede yet! Thanks for the info Ronny.