Translate
Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 27.4K other subscribers
Buy me a cup of tea or two

Buy me a cup of tea or two? Change the number below to increment. i.e insert 2 = £8, 3 = £12, etc

Overheads to run this site, e.g. software packages, domain registration fees, software tools, misc items. Donate £4 or more so I have the fuel to keep on providing great content!

£4.00

From day 1 of my diagnosis, I knew my liver was going to need some attention, but I had always known that total removal of all tumours would not be possible – the diagnostic scan confirmed I had an incurable disease. This critical organ did in fact produce the biopsy confirming Neuroendocrine Cancer. The early scans indicated multiple liver lesions and an Octreotide scan reported several with quite avid isotope activity.

However, as you can see from my clinical history, they first stabilised my syndrome via daily Octreotide so my tumours were subdued ready for major surgery which took place Nov 2010 – I wrote about this as Part 1 and Part 2 stories. As we are talking about my liver, it’s worth noting that a bland Liver Embolization was carried out prior to my initial surgery as there was an option to look at the liver whilst I was ‘open’. However, after 9 hours of sorting out my other areas including a significant chunk of time looking at my retroperitoneal fibrosis, there was insufficient time.

This graphic is me and you can see the largest tumour on my liver (just above the ‘en’ in Neuroendocrine)

My surgeon (Mr Neil Pearce) promised me a hard year so after 4 months ‘rest’, I was brought back in for major liver surgery which took place on 12 Apr 2011. The ‘luck’ word has to be mentioned again because my local NET MDT was at the time led by Mr Neil Pearce who just happened to be one of UK’s top GI surgeons and one of the pioneers of Laparoscopic surgery – that is what I was to receive. In the end, I had a right hepatectomy and a metastasectomy which was calculated to be approximately 66% of my liver removed. Thank goodness it grows back!  You can see from the post picture, the type of instruments used in laparoscopic surgery and the fact that they pump air into the abdomen to give sufficient space to operate.

The operation went well lasting 6 hours although it could have been shorter. Mr Pearce unfortunately had to spend a quarter of this time picking through ‘dense right-sided abdominal adhesions’ caused by the primary surgery. My liver metastasis was described as significant on inspection and around 90% of the tumours were removed during this procedure leaving around half a dozen sub-centimeter “deposits”. Interestingly he said the pattern of disease was more conspicuous on intra-abdominal ultrasound than it had been on previous scans

I recovered quickly after only 5 days in the hospital and was back at work in 3 weeks. My Chromogranin A finally returned to normal readings recognising the reduction in tumour bulk. My 5HIAA was already back in normal after ’round 1′ and subsequent commencement of Lanreotide. For those who have not had a liver laparoscopic procedure, the healing time is much quicker, and you only have limited scarring. I had 3 ‘stab wounds’ (that’s my name for the marks!) across the area of my liver and then a 3-inch scar at the base of my abdomen which was used to remove the ‘bits’ of the resected liver.

A follow-up chemoembolization or TACE (Trans Arterial Chemo embolization) was scheduled a few weeks after the liver surgery which was looking to target the remnant liver tumours. However, this had to be aborted following some routing issues caused by primary surgery.

I still have some residual (but stable) disease on my liver but there has been no real progression since – in fact I met Neil Pearce in 2018 and he’s surprised there hasn’t been progression – I hope to keep surprising him. It’s no secret that debulking or cytoreductive surgery can be of benefit even to those with advanced or metastatic well-differentiated Neuroendocrine disease. I remain thankful for the care and attention I received in the months after my diagnosis. 

Despite being clearly seen on CT at diagnosis, my remnant liver mets appear to be better seen on Ga68 PET/CT than on standalone CT – read about why this might be here.

laparoscopic
Keyhole surgery

Visualising NET metastases in the liver

Liver NETs can often be difficult to see and there is some potential for false positives on imaging e.g. cysts and haemangiomas. However, NETs are known for their hypervascularity, and imaging techniques can often take advantage of that. Most liver metastases will have been found by CT with IV contrast where they will show as hyperenhancing lesions.  However, what is not that well known is that they are best seen in the arterial phase of a triple phase CT scan.  You can read more about some my own experience of surveillance since 2010 – click here.

Click the picture to read

MRI is the best conventional study to detail hepatic metastases in NETs although not as good as the CT for some primaries including the GI tract and mesentery lesions. 

Ultrasound is another method and as most liver biopsies use ultrasound to guide the tissue removal, the visibility must clearly be acceptable – but in general, they are otherwise only useful for estimating hepatic tumor burden.  It was a useful tool during my liver surgery as per above. 

Somatostatin Receptor PETs are great for seeing somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive tumours but physicians and radiologists must be aware of various physiologic and other pathologic processes in which cellular expression of SSTR can result in interpretative error.

Disclaimer

I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me. 

Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional. Some content may be generated by AI which can sometimes be misinterpreted.  Please check any references attached.    

Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.

Click picture to subscribe

Thanks for reading.

Ronny

Blog Facebook. Like this page please.

Personal Facebook. Like this page please.

Awareness Facebook Like this page please.

Follow me on X (formerly twitter)

Check out my online presentations

Check out my WEGO Health Awards

Check out my Glossary of Terms – click here

patients included

Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient

 
 
 
Facebook
X
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Email

Test Template Ronny Allan

Discover more from Ronny Allan – Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email. Type your email… Subscribe

Read More »

Discover more from Ronny Allan - Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Ronny Allan - Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.