A multicentre validation of the NETPET score (Dual [68Ga]DOTATATE and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic GEPNENs

Translate

Background

It’s normally the case that the higher the grade/Ki67 in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs), the less likely the tumours will have somatostatin receptors and therefore be able to take advantage of somatostatin receptor PET (SSTR PET) as the gold standard in nuclear imaging.  This is why most grade 3 NENs will receive [18F]FDG PET/CT which finds glycolytic activity in the tumour and predicts an aggressive disease course and normally a higher histological grade. It can also add to prognostic outcomes, which in turn can add to therapy choice decisions. 

There is an overlap though, particularly with the recognition of well-differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs).  It is known that some glycolytic activity might be present in some well-differentiated NETs, in particular, grade 3 and the upper range of 2 Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs).

Conversely, increased uptake on [68Ga]DOTA-SSTR PET reflects receptor density and correlates with well-differentiated histology, more favourable outcomes and better response to PRRT.

The combination of imaging metabolism ([18F]FDG PET) and receptor (target) expression ([68Ga]DOTA-SSTR PET) – referred to as “dual PET imaging” – provides a comprehensive overview of the status of the disease throughout the entire body.

What is the “NETPET” score?

Reporting dual scan findings in a text-based report is complex particularly when physicians are already dealing with the complexity of NENs with the different primary locations.  To address this, a group of physicians from UK and Australia previously proposed the NETPET score, a 5-point scoring system for dual PET reporting in subjects with metastatic NENs. The study was limited to Gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEPNENs). 

It summarises the information provided in [68Ga]DOTA-SSTR/[18F]FDG PET scans into a single parameter. This score correlated with overall survival in a small sample of 62 patients with NENs of various primaries.  However, the single-centre nature of the study did not give a confident translation of the results into clinical practice.

Chan DLH, Pavlakis N, Schembri GP, Bernard EJ, Hsiao E, Hayes A, Barnes T, Diakos C, Khasraw M, Samra J, Eslick E, Roach PJ, Engel A, Clarke SJ, Bailey DL. Dual Somatostatin Receptor/FDG PET/CT Imaging in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: Proposal for a Novel Grading Scheme with Prognostic Significance. Theranostics 2017; 7(5):1149-1158. doi:10.7150/thno.18068. https://www.thno.org/v07p1149.htm

The international study

Cue an international multicentre, and retrospective study (319 patients) aimed to investigate whether the NETPET score retained its prognostic power in a large group of patients with metastatic GEPNENs.  The study conclusion said “Our large multicentre study validates the NETPET score as a robust prognostic biomarker of OS (overall survival) and TTP (time to progression) in patients with metastatic GEPNEN, and it represents a valuable complement to the prognostic algorithm. Dual PET imaging should be considered in all patients with a diagnosis of metastatic GEPNEN to guide the most optimal site for biopsy and inform the management approach.”  The study also recommended the use of dual PET imaging for patients with rapidly progressing disease (irrespective of original biopsy findings), and those with grade 2 or well-differentiated grade 3 disease, in order to identify areas of potentially [18F]FDG avid, non-[68Ga]DOTATATE avid (i.e. discordant) disease. Such sites may not respond to SSTR-dependent therapies, thus influencing treatment selection. The study also acknowledged that economic considerations such as funding for dual tracers may limit the widespread adoption of routine dual PET imaging into clinical practice.

Reference Citation and Link

Chan, D.L., Hayes, A.R., Karfis, I. et al. Dual [68Ga]DOTATATE and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a multicentre validation of the NETPET score. Br J Cancer (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-02061-5 

Summary

This is a developing area, and I can see it often inside my private patient group.  I would say to those patients who are reading, this is not a standard approach across the board, and you should not expect to get dual PETs.  The approximate boundary is contained in the studies above and the term ‘metastatic’ is another boundary clue.  But interest in this approach is growing including this Canadian study I wrote about in 2021. 

Disclaimer

I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me.  Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional as they are not members of the private group or followers of my sites in any official capacity.  Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.

Subscribe to my newsletter

Thanks for reading.

Ronny

I’m also active on Facebook. Like my page for even more news. Help me build up my new site here – click here and ‘Like’

Sign up for my newsletters – Click Here

Disclaimer

My Diagnosis and Treatment History

Follow me on twitter

Check out my online presentations

Check out my WEGO Health Awards

Like my new awareness page – click here or on the photo.  (Like rather than follow please!)

Check out my Glossary of Terms – click here

patients included

Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient

 
 
 
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Email

Neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon but definitely not rare

USA finally commits  UK and Australian figures recently confirmed that Neuroendocrine Cancer is the 10th and 7th most common cancer type.  It was great to

Read More »

Cancer Ablation

What is Cancer Ablation? This is a minimally invasive surgical method to treat solid cancers. Special probes are used to “burn” or “freeze” cancers. Computed

Read More »

Lactose intolerance – the NET Effect

Background   When I cast my mind back to my very first surgery, I remember asking my Oncologist what I could do to put on weight. 

Read More »

EUS Guided Ablation for small pancreatic NETs (Less than 2cm)

To burn or not to burn? I once wrote a post about Pancreatic NET “to cut or not to cut”.  You can read that here. 

Read More »

RonnyAllan.NET – a review of 2022

Review In 2022, my pet project (my blog) hit 2 million views in early November – that was a major boost.  It takes 3-4 years to get

Read More »

RonnyAllan.NET – Summary of December 2022

Summary December is always the quietest month of the year, no surprise why!  However, the top 10 below is somewhat surprising, I guess some posts

Read More »

Happy New Year from Ronny

Another year of survival I normally only do a Facebook happy new year, but I wanted to make sure I reached everyone who follows my

Read More »

Piss off cancer – 12 years of Christmas and I’m still here!

12 Christmas celebrations since diagnosis and I’m still here.  My Facebook memories today are full of Christmas day activities including my first Christmas after diagnosis

Read More »

A Christmas 2022 message from Ronny

Background to 2022 I’ve only ever sent these on Facebook but this year, after some challenges, I wanted to make sure I covered anyone who

Read More »

I love comments - feel free!

%d bloggers like this: