Updated December 2025
Background
Scanning is a key diagnostic support and surveillance tool for any cancer. Even though you have elevated bloods or urine (….or not), a picture of your insides is really like a thousand words…. and each picture has a story behind it.
Scanning can be a game changer in the hunt for tumours and although scans do not normally confirm the cancer type and grade, they certainly help with that piece of detective work and are key in the staging of the cancer.
When I read stories of people in a difficult diagnosis, I always find myself saying ‘a scan might resolve this’ and I always suggest people should try to get one. Even in the case of a story about late diagnosis or a misdiagnosis, I find myself thinking ‘if only they had done a scan earlier’. Despite what you read on NET forums; a CT scan will be able to find some evidence of tumour activity in 90-95% of cases. However, some are cunningly small or hiding and it can be like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Plus, CT scans for liver need to be triple phase. In some of the more difficult cases, finding a doctor who thinks like a detective can be a plus.
However, scans are not an exact science…..not yet! Apart from human error, sometimes tumours are too small to see and/or there are issues with ‘pickup’ (i.e. with NETs, nuclear scans need efficient somatostatin receptors). The differences between scan types are more quality (sensitivity) related as new technologies are introduced.
As for my own experience, I was very lucky. I managed to get a referral to a specialist early on in my diagnosis phase. He looked at the referral notes and said, “what are you doing this afternoon“. I replied, “whatever you want me to do“. He didn’t know I had cancer, but his instincts led him to believe he needed to see inside my body, i.e. he wanted to scan me. The scan results were pretty clear – I had a metastatic Cancer and further checks were now needed to ascertain exactly what it was. So, I took my seat on the roller coaster. Medicine is not an exact science (not yet anyway) but here’s something I believe is a very common occurrence in all cancers – If your doctors don’t suspect something, they won’t detect anything.
There’s frequent discussion about the best types of scans for different types of NETs and which is best for different parts of the anatomy. There are also different views on the subject (including in the medical community), However, a few well known facts can be gleaned from authoritative NET sources:
Scanning is a key diagnostic and surveillance tool for any cancer. Even though you have elevated bloods or urine (….or not), a picture of your insides is really like a thousand words…. and each picture has a story behind it. Scanning can be a game changer in the hunt for tumours and although scans can’t (yet) confirm the cancer type and grade, they certainly help with that piece of detective work and are key in the staging of the cancer.
When I read stories of people in a difficult diagnosis, I always find myself saying ‘a scan might resolve this’ and I always suggest people should try to get one. Even in the case of a story about late diagnosis or a misdiagnosis, I find myself thinking ‘if only they had done a scan earlier’. Despite what you read on NET forums, a CT scan will normally find some evidence of most tumour activity.
However, scans are not an exact science…..not yet!
As for my own experience, I was very lucky. I managed to get a referral to a specialist early on in my diagnosis phase. He looked at the referral notes and said “what are you doing this afternoon”. I replied “whatever you want me to do”. He wanted to scan me. He didn’t know I had cancer but his instincts led him to believe he needed to see inside my body. The scan results were pretty clear – I had a metastatic Cancer and further checks were now needed to ascertain exactly what it was. So I took my seat on the rollercoaster. Here’s something I always say I believe is so much better than the impractical early diagnosis messages that seem to pervade our community: If your doctors don’t suspect something, they won’t detect anything and I believe this is a very frequent outcome of many diagnoses for many cancers (not just NETs).
There’s frequent discussion about the best types of scans for different types of NETs and even for different parts of the anatomy. This is correct and there’s also different views on the subject (including in the medical community), However, a few well known facts that can be gleaned from authoritative NET sources
Sooner we can all get access to the latest radionuclide scans the better!
Thanks for reading
Ronny
Conventional Imaging
Computed Topography (CT)
CT scans are often the initial imaging study for a patient presenting with signs or symptoms suggestive of many cancers including NET. These studies are most useful for disease staging and surgical planning as they provide excellent anatomic detail of the tumours themselves and surrounding structures. Primary NETs (GI and lung NETs) and their metastases are generally hyper-enhancing with IV contrast. One nugget I found is that they are best seen in the arterial phase of a triple phase CT scan.
In primary NETs, the average sensitivity of a CT scan is 73%. CT scans have even better sensitivity in detecting NET metastases, as they demonstrate 80% sensitivity for liver metastases (but see MRI below) and 75% sensitivity for other metastases (non-liver). This modality is also useful when the primary tumour site is unknown. In one single-institution retrospective study, it was the most common study ordered to look for an unknown primary tumour site and was able to uncover the primary in 95% of cases.
NETs are known for their hypervascularity and it’s important that those ordering scans and radiologists interpreting scans know that NET liver metastases are best seen on triple-phase scans, particularly in the late arterial phase. Read more here to see a graphic on why this is important. Click on my blog post “Now you see them, now you don’t“
CT enterography (CTE)
CT enterography uses special x-ray equipment and an injection of contrast material after the ingestion of liquid to produce detailed images of the small intestine and structures within the abdomen and pelvis. It’s often used to identify and locate problems within the bowel, such as inflammation, bleeding, obstructions and Crohn’s disease. CT scanning is fast, painless, non-invasive and accurate. CT enterography is better able to visualize the entire thickness of the bowel wall when compared to other small intestine imaging procedures. See a practical use of this type of CT from a well known respected NET Specialist in US.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
MRI is the best conventional study to detail liver metastases in NETs. It is not as useful as CT for the detection of primary small bowel lesions or their associated lymphadenopathy but is good for the detection of primary pancreatic NETs. A study comparing MRI, CT and standard somatostatin receptor-based imaging (OctreoScan) reported 95.2% sensitivity for MRI, 78.5% sensitivity for CT and 49.3% sensitivity for the OctreoScan in detecting hepatic metastases. MRI also detected significantly more liver lesions than the other two modalities. Some guidelines suggest the MRI is even better than a nuclear scan for smaller liver tumours.
You may see something called Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a special type of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam that produces detailed images of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic systems, including the liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, pancreas and pancreatic duct.
Like the CT Enterography mentioned above, there’s an MRI equivalent known as MRI Enterography.
Contrast agents
Many people ask about the role and need for contrast agents – you may find this summary useful – click here.
Ultrasound (US)
The primary role of conventional ultrasound in neuroendocrine disease is the detection of liver metastases and the estimation of total liver tumour burden. This technique has the advantages of near-universal availability, intraoperative utility, minimal expense, and lack of radiation. Most examinations are performed without contrast, which limits their sensitivity (compared with CT and MRI). I know in my own situation; US was used to guide my initial biopsy and as a quick check following the identification of multiple liver metastases during a CT scan. I’ve also had US used to monitor distant lymph nodes in the neck area but always in conjunction with the most recent CT scan output.
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)
With increased access to endoscopy, NETs in the stomach, duodenum, and rectum are increasingly incidentally detected on upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Patients are frequently asymptomatic without any symptoms referable to the NET (i.e. non-functional). EUS has also been used to survey patients at increased risk of developing pancreatic NETs. For example, patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1). They are also frequently used in conjunction with biopsies using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) guided by EUS.
Taking the camera inside and directly to the Tumour
Of course, there are other ways to “see it” via several types of scope procedures, including gastrointestinal (Endoscopy) and lung (Bronchoscopy). Read my article about scopes and cameras by clicking here. A colonoscopy is a type of Endoscopy.
Somatostatin receptor-based imaging techniques
Somatostatin is an endogenous peptide that is secreted by neuroendocrine cells, activated immune cells and inflammatory cells. It affects its antiproliferative and antisecretory functions by binding to one of five types of somatostatin receptors (SSTR1- SSTR5). These are G-protein coupled receptors and are normally distributed in the brain, pituitary, pancreas, thyroid, spleen, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, vasculature, peripheral nervous system and on immune cells. Expression of SSTRs is highest on well-differentiated NETs. Somatostatin receptor type 2 is the most highly expressed subtype, followed by SSTRs 1 and 5, SSTR3 and SSTR4.
It must be noted that even the most modern scans are not an exact science. Radionuclide scans are like conventional imaging, they can be subject to physiological uptake or false positives, i.e. they can indicate suspicious looking ‘glows’ that mimic tumours. Try my “understanding your PET guide – click here.
The ubiquity of SSTRs on NET cell surfaces makes them ideal targets for treatment (e.g. Somatostatin Analogues (Octreotide/Lanreotide) and PRRT), but also for imaging. There are two primary types of somatostatin receptor-based imaging available:
Octreoscan – In111 based
The most common (currently) is the OctreoScan or Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy (SRS), which uses the ligand 111In-DPTA-D-Phe-1-octreotide and binds primarily to SSTR2 and SSTR5. In its original form, it provided a planar, full body image. In modern practice, this image is fused with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and CT. This takes advantage of the specificity of the OctreoScan and the anatomic detail provided by SPECT/CT, improving OctreoScan’s diagnostic accuracy. These improvements have been shown to alter the management in approximately 15% of cases, compared with just OctreoScan images. In primary tumours, the OctreoScan’s sensitivity ranges from 35 to 80%, with its performance for unknown primary tumours dipping beneath the lower end of that range (24%). Its ability to detect the primary is limited by the size but not SSTR2 expression, as tumours less than 2 cm are significantly more likely not to localize but do not have significantly different SSTR2 expression than their larger counterparts.
Octreoscan – Tc99m based
In one study, it was shown that sensitivity and negative predictive values of Tc-99m-Octreotide scan is significantly higher than that of CT and MRI. Using Tc-99m instead of In-111 had several advantages that include better availability, cheaper and higher quality images. In addition, to less radiation exposure to both patients and nuclear medicine personnel. In the absence of Ga68 PET, this could prove a reliable alternative. Please note this scan is completed in a single day vs In111 Octreotide time of 2-3 days.
Somatostatin Receptor PET (SSTR PET)
Ga68 PET/CT
The newest somatostatin receptor-based imaging modality, although it has been around for some time, particularly in Europe. The most common of these approved labelled analogues are 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE. They may be known collectively as ‘SSTR-PET’. Additionally, the DOTATATE version may often be referred to as NETSPOT in USA but technically that is just the commercial name for the radionuclide mix. Read more about SSTR PET scans by clicking here
These peptides are easier and cheaper to synthesize than standard octreotide-analogue based ligands, boast single time point image acquisition compared to 2 or 3 days with Octreoscan. Its superior spatial resolution derives from the fact that it measures the radiation from two photons coincidentally. SPECT, in comparison, measures the gamma radiation emitted from one photon directly. This results in different limitations of detection – millimetres for 68Ga-PET compared with 1 cm or more for SPECT. There are a few choices of ligands with this type of imaging, but the differences lie primarily in their SSTR affinities – all of the ligands bind with great affinity to SSTR2 and SSTR5. 68Ga-DOTANOC also binds to SSTR3. Despite these differences, no single 68Ga ligand has stood out as the clear choice for use in NETs. As with standard somatostatin receptor-based imaging, these 68Ga-PET studies are fused with CT to improve anatomic localization.
Comparison studies between 68Ga-PET and standard imaging techniques (CT, OctreoScan) have universally demonstrated the superiority of 68Ga-PET in detection of NET primary tumors and metastases. Two early studies compared 68Ga-DOTATOC to standard somatostatin imaging (SRS)-SPECT and CT. Buchmann et al. reported that 68Ga-DOTATOC detected more than 279 NET lesions in 27 patients with histologically proven NETs, whereas SRS-SPECT detected only 157. The greatest number of lesions were detected in the liver. 68Ga-DOTATOC found more than 152 hepatic lesions, while SRS-SPECT found only 105, resulting in a 66% concordance rate between the two modalities. The concordance for abdominal lymph nodes was worse at 40.1%. Cleary these advantages are going to impact treatment plans, some needing to be altered. In addition, 68Ga-DOTA PET imaging can be used to determine which patients might benefit from use of Somatostatin Analogues (Octreotide/Lanreotide) and PRRT – you can read more about this integrated and potentially personalised treatment in my article on ‘Theranostics‘ – click here.
It’s worth pointing out that SSTR PET is replacing previous types of radionuclide scans, mainly Octreoscan (Indium 111) and is not replacing conventional imaging (CI) such as CT and MRI etc. Whilst SSTR-PET has demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity than CI and In-111, there are specific instances in which SSTR-PET is clearly preferred: at initial diagnosis, when selecting patients for PRRT, and for localization of unknown primaries. For patients in which the tumor is readily seen on CI, SSTR-PET is not needed for routine monitoring. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine has just published “Appropriate Use Criteria for Somatostatin Receptor PET Imaging in Neuroendocrine Tumors” which gives guidance on its use – issued by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI).
Cu64 PET/CT (Detectnet) Cu64 Detectnet
Approved by the US FDA on 4th September 2020. Click here to learn about this new type.
Ga-68 NODAGA-exendin-4 has been shown to bind to a receptor on insulinomas with high affinity
Regular SSTR PET (e.g. Ga68) is a bit hit and miss with insulinomas. Based on clinical readings by experts, the accuracy of exendin PET/CT was higher than any other technique, according to the findings of this study published by radiology Journal Aunt Minnie. CECT found lesions suspicious for insulinoma in 63% of patients; CE-DWI-MRI identified lesions in 60% of patients; CECT and CE-DWI-MRI combined in 68% of patients; DOTA-SSA PET/CT in 55% of patients; EUS in 71% of patients; and exendin PET/CT in 79% of patients. In addition, in 13% of patients, a correct diagnosis was only reached after exendin PET/CT, the researchers noted.
Understanding your SSTR PET scan reports
Many people ask questions about understanding the results of SSTR PET, it’s easy to misread the terminology. I compile this blog post to help with that and it includes a section on a similar problem with FDG PETs. Click here or on the picture to read.
Other PET Scans
18FDG PET
18-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose PET (FDG PET) is used to detect malignancy for a variety of tumour types. Unfortunately, its utility has not been borne out in NETs, as the majority of NETs tend to be relatively metabolically inactive and fail to take up the tracer well. However, high-grade NETs are more likely to demonstrate avid uptake of 18FDG, giving these scans utility in identifying tumours likely to display more aggressive behaviour. That said, many grade 2 NETs, particularly at the higher Ki67 levels, may benefit from a FDG PET to assess tumour heterogeneity.
18F-FDOPA PET
Despite the vast rollout of somatostatin receptor-based PETs (e.g. Ga68 or Cu64 etc) (SSTR PET), this elderly scan is still in the NET toolbox.
The use of Fluoro-18-L-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) in PET was developed in the 80’s for the visualisation of the dopaminergic system in patients with degenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s Disease and related disorders. The first publication on the use of 18F-FDOPA PET for brain imaging was in 1983, which was followed by many others on the use of 18F-FDOPA PET for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Years later, in 1999 the first publication on the use of 18F-FDOPA PET for imaging of neuroendocrine tumour appeared. The value of 18F-FDOPA PET has now been proven for the diagnosis and staging of many neuroendocrine tumours, brain tumours and congenital hyperinsulinaemia of infants.
18F-FDOPA is accurate for studying well differentiated tumours. However, the difficult and expensive synthesis have limited its clinical employment. It currently can be successfully used for imaging tumours with variable to low expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) such as Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma, Neuroblastoma, Pheochromocytoma), and others that cannot be accurately studied with Somatostatin SSTR scans such as the OctreoScan (Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy (SRS)), which uses the ligand 111In-DPTA-D-Phe-1-octreotide or the newer 68Ga DOTA-peptides. Read more about the use of 18F-FDOPA in ‘endocrine tumours’ here. Please bear in mind that more recent Ga68 PET studies may supersede some of the data mentioned. If in doubt, ask your specialist. This article from 2022 confirms its utility – click here.
Interest only – Dual PET Scans
Dual Tracer (68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG) PET Imaging in G2 & G3 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours
A multicentre validation of the NETPET score (Dual [68Ga]DOTATATE and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic GEPNENs
Miscellaneous Scans
123I-MIBG
Radioiodinated (123I) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is an analog of norepinephrine that is used to image catecholamine-secreting NETs such as pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas and glomus tumors. It can also be used to look for Neuroblastoma in children. In patients with functional pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas, this modality has a sensitivity of 90% and positive predictive value of 100%. However, it has limited use in Gastrointestinal (GI) NETs, as this modality was positive in only 49.1% of patients. In the same cohort of patients, OctreoScan was positive in 91.2%. As an imaging tool, this study is best used to confirm a diagnosis of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and define the extent of metastatic disease in these tumours. Its most practical use in GI NETs may be to determine whether patients with metastases may benefit from treatment with 131I-MIBG (a form of radiotherapy). Please bear in mind that more recent Ga68 PET studies (click here) may supersede some of the data mentioned. If in doubt, ask your specialist.
Parathyroid Scan
Sestamibi scanning is the preferred way in which to localize diseased parathyroid glands prior to an operation. This parathyroid scan was invented in the early 1990’s and now is widely available. Sestamibi is a small protein which is labelled with the radio-pharmaceutical technetium99 (Tc99m). This very mild and safe radioactive agent is injected into the veins of a patient with hyperparathyroidism (parathyroid disease) and is absorbed by the overactive parathyroid gland. Since normal parathyroid glands are inactive when there is high calcium in the bloodstream, they do not take up the radioactive particles. When a gamma camera is placed over the patient’s neck an accurate picture will show the overactive gland. Only the overactive parathyroid gland shows up…a very accurate test.
The Sest
amibi scan will display the hyperactive gland which is causing hyperparathyroidism in about 90 percent (90% sensitivity) of all patients. If the Sestamibi does show the hyperactive gland it is almost always correct (98-100% specificity). It takes approximately two hours to perform the Sestamibi scan after it has been injected. Pictures of the neck and chest are usually taken immediately after the injection and again in 1.75 to 2.0 hours (shown above). Newer techniques allow for more complete two- and three-dimensional images to be obtained of a patient’s neck. This technique is called SPECT scanning (Single Proton Emission Computerized Tomography) but it is usually not necessary.
Four-dimensional parathyroid CT (4D-CT) is a specialized imaging study that was first introduced in 2006 for the purpose of identifying abnormal parathyroid glands in the planning of parathyroid surgery. The patient is given intravenous contrast, which is an iodine-based dye that enhances the quality of imaging. Images are then acquired with the CT scanner at very specific times when the contrast is maximally taken up by the parathyroid glands. (The “fourth dimension” is time.)
Skeletal Scintigraphy (bone scan)
Quite often, bone metastases in NETs will be found via conventional imaging or special to NET nuclear scans such as Ga68 PET or MIBG. However, a bone scan can often find them or confirm findings of scans looking for NETs.
Skeletal scintigraphy is a special type of nuclear medicine procedure that uses small amounts of radioactive material to diagnose and assess the severity of a variety of bone diseases and conditions, including fractures, infection, and cancer.
Nuclear medicine imaging procedures are non-invasive and — with the exception of intravenous injections — usually painless medical tests that help physicians diagnose and evaluate medical conditions. These imaging scans use radioactive materials called radiopharmaceuticals or radiotracers. Radioactive energy emitted from the radiotracer is detected by a special camera or imaging device that produces pictures of the bones called scintigrams. Abnormalities are indicated by areas of abnormal bone that take up more or less of the radiopharmaceutical which appear brighter or darker than normal bone on the scintigram.
Because nuclear medicine procedures are able to image the functions of the body at the molecular level, they offer the potential to identify disease in its earliest stages as well as a patient’s response to therapeutic interventions. In fact, a bone scan can often find bone abnormalities much earlier than a regular x-ray exam.
Echocardiogram
An echocardiogram, or “echo”, is a scan used to look at the heart and nearby blood vessels. It’s a type of ultrasound scan, which means a small probe is used to send out high-frequency sound waves that create echoes when they bounce off different parts of the body. These echoes are picked up by the probe and turned into a moving image on a monitor while the scan is carried out.
These are mainly used in cases of diagnosed or suspected Hedinger Syndrome (so called carcinoid heart disease). Although there is more than one type of echo, it is normally done using a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). The test is either non-invasive or you can resume your usual activities immediately afterward.
Although it has a similar name, an echocardiogram is not the same as an electrocardiogram (ECG), which is a test used to check your heart’s rhythm and electrical activity.
The future of PET Scans is here!
Click here to read my summary.
Summary
If you can see it, you can detect it. The sooner we can ALL get access to the latest radionuclide scans the better – this is currently an unmet need in many countries. If you are any doubt about which type of scan is best for you and their availability, please consult your specialist.
Sources:
1. Imaging in neuroendocrine tumors: an update for the clinician, Maxwell, Howe,
2. Appropriate use Criteria for Somatostatin Receptor PET Imaging in Neuroendocrine Tumors,
4. Role of 18F‐FDOPA PET/CT imaging in endocrinology. (added for information on 18F F-DOPA)
5. Current status of PET imaging of neuroendocrine tumours ([18F]FDOPA, [68Ga]tracers, [11C]/[18F]-HTP). (added for information on 18F F-DOPA)
6. Understanding your SSTR PET Scan report (also contains FDG advice)
Disclaimer
I am not a doctor or any form of medical professional, practitioner or counsellor. None of the information on my website, or linked to my website(s), or conveyed by me on any social media or presentation, should be interpreted as medical advice given or advised by me.
Neither should any post or comment made by a follower or member of my private group be assumed to be medical advice, even if that person is a healthcare professional. Some content may be generated by AI which can sometimes be misinterpreted. Please check any references attached.
Please also note that mention of a clinical service, trial/study or therapy does not constitute an endorsement of that service, trial/study or therapy by Ronny Allan, the information is provided for education and awareness purposes and/or related to Ronny Allan’s own patient experience. This element of the disclaimer includes any complementary medicine, non-prescription over the counter drugs and supplements such as vitamins and minerals.
Click here and answer all questions to join my private Facebook group
Facebook
Twitter
WordPress
Instagram
Thanks for reading.
Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient
- Cancer: Words are important but so is context
Words are very important to cancer patients, some people hang their hats on them and put their feet up, and some people google them until they are tied in a knot, still fraught with worry. Why can’t doctors just tell me in layman’s language? Easy answer ……. because it is not an exact science. Doctors… Read more: Cancer: Words are important but so is context - Newsletter covering January and February 2026
Overview Many thanks for the support in January and February 2026. This is a double month newsletter due to my 27 day holiday! 2026 Blog Activity for January and February Actually, despite my holiday figures are pretty much normal. I had a great month in December 2025, perhaps I was overperforming as I was anticipating… Read more: Newsletter covering January and February 2026 - Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET) – Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin)
Vitamin B12 deficiency is demonstrably more common in people with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) – what that means is there is a chance your deficiency as a NET patients may not be related to your NET. However, it’s a fairly common comorbidity reported in NET patients and it’s important to note the mechanisms differ by primary… Read more: Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET) – Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin) - Sometimes you gotta climb that bridge!
When I was a young lad, I didn’t seem to have a fear of heights, not that I got many chances to test it but a couple of things springs to mind. As a ‘feral youth’ I once climbed to the top of a factory building without fear. I won’t divulge any further detail, just… Read more: Sometimes you gotta climb that bridge! - 50 years of marriage – in sickness and in health
When I was diagnosed with metastatic Neuroendocrine Cancer in 2010, there’s a lot of milestones I doubted I would reach. One is today and I can now tick off another and be thankful for reaching it. I have been married to a kind and beautiful lady for 50 years on – 29th March 2025. I’ve… Read more: 50 years of marriage – in sickness and in health - Zanzalintinib Versus Everolimus in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (STELLAR-311)
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized Open-Label Study of Zanzalintinib vs Everolimus in Participants With Previously Treated, Unresectable, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of zanzalintinib compared to everolimus in participants with previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Zanzalintinib (XL092) is an investigational,… Read more: Zanzalintinib Versus Everolimus in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (STELLAR-311) - Next Generation Total-Body PET/CT: Challenges and Opportunities
Long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) systems have changed the field of molecular imaging. Since their introduction, many PET centres have installed these next-generation digital systems to provide more detailed imaging and acquire PET images in a single bed position. Indeed, vertex to thigh imaging for oncological indications can be obtained in most of the population with the… Read more: Next Generation Total-Body PET/CT: Challenges and Opportunities - Phase 1/2 Trial Evaluating CRN09682 for the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Other Somatostatin Receptor 2-Expressing Tumors
Crinetics Announces First Patient Dosed in Phase 1/2 Trial Evaluating CRN09682 for the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumours and Other Somatostatin Receptor 2-Expressing Tumours Read the news – click here Clinical Trial Document – click here Limited to US (6 locations) (so far). CRN09682, a first‑in‑class non‑peptide drug conjugate (NDC) developed by Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. The company… Read more: Phase 1/2 Trial Evaluating CRN09682 for the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Other Somatostatin Receptor 2-Expressing Tumors - Ronny Allan – a review of my blog activity December 2025
Here is the monthly summary of December 2025 on RonnyAllan.NET – Every share helps someone understand or even work towards a diagnosis, discovery of the best doctors and treatments. December is normally a quiet month, often the quietist month of the year. However, this year, it was the best figures for the whole of 2025. … Read more: Ronny Allan – a review of my blog activity December 2025 - A review of 2025 on RonnyAllan.NET
Summary of 2025 from Ronny It was a good year for my advocacy work but a difficult year personally which had some impact on my advocacy work. I had to spend quite a bit of time looking after my brother’s affairs when he was diagnosed with dementia and is now living in residential care. That… Read more: A review of 2025 on RonnyAllan.NET - 15 years of Christmas!
15 Christmas celebrations since diagnosis. A thankful statement My Facebook memories today are full of Christmas activities including my first Christmas following diagnosis of advanced Neuroendocrine Cancer. I had been out of hospital for only 4 weeks following major surgery in 2010. I remember the whole of my own family attended, my son and daughter’s… Read more: 15 years of Christmas! - Another Next Generation PET/CT is coming soon. The Omni 128cm Total Body PET – Small Australian trial at Peter Mac
A Global first for NET. Omni 128cm Total Body PET at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne Australia. According to Professor Michael Hofman, they have been using the camera for a couple weeks and it is exceeding their expectations. They’re running a short trial comparing results against regular PETs. The great news is that… Read more: Another Next Generation PET/CT is coming soon. The Omni 128cm Total Body PET – Small Australian trial at Peter Mac
Please Share this post for Neuroendocrine Cancer awareness and to help another patient
Discover more from Ronny Allan - Living with Neuroendocrine Cancer
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’ve been reading your blog for hours and I’m learning SO much!!! You are helping me piece everything together and I’m so grateful for you and your kindness to help so many. Thank you!!
I am taking all of my info to my Primary and will be asking him for the labs/tests and to see if he will do one of these scans.
If I was only able to only pick one scan, which one do you think would be most helpful in the diagnosis?
I have 2 “lipomas” in my Thoracic spine where a lot of my pain and symptoms are. I also have scattered cysts in my liver, spleen, kidney and thyroid.
The radiologist always puts “more than likely benign, recheck if having symptoms”
I had 2 pretty severe reactions to Epinephrine when I had some skin biopsies. The doctor asked if I was a “heart patient” and I told her not that I know of. She said that she sees my type of reaction in heart patients but now I’m reading it can go along with NETS too.
I also have endocrine symptoms that no one can really diagnose including abnormal labs.
My VIP lab came back “flagged High”
My Rheumatoid Factor also came back high (40) but the other rheumatoid labs came back normal. I know that an elevated RH Factor can be seen in some cancers.
I have flagged Low WBC and my other blood counts are low to low/normal
My daughter was just diagnosed with a Parathyroid Tumor after having symptoms for 18 months and none of the doctors taking her serious. It was her research and persistence that finally got her the scan which showed the Adenoma. Now she’s scheduled for her surgery consult and hopefully on the road to full recovery after suffering terribly and feeling “crazy” because the doctors wouldn’t listen to her. I am in the same boat knowing that I have something going on with me and my body is getting weaker and weaker to the point I’m worried I won’t wake up some mornings.
I have my appointment with my regular doctor next Wednesday and I will be bringing him a lot of this information and asking him for one of these scans. I’m praying that he will listen.
I am in Georgia. Do you know of any NET doctors in Ga that would be good to make an appt with if my doctor won’t take me serious?
Again, thank you so much for your hard work and information to help others!!
https://ronnyallan.net/2018/09/07/diagnosising-the-undiagnosed/
https://ronnyallan.net/2017/04/25/diagnosed-with-neuroendocrine-cancer-10-questions-to-ask-your-doctor/
I have been diagnosed with a 1.5 centimeter endocrine tumor. It is between my liver and my right kidney. It is in a spot where it cannot be biopsied. I had one 13 yrs. ago in the ilial secum area and it was malignant. My doctor wants to wait for a year to do another NET SPOT test. What would you advise I do? I am 77yrs. old.
Any other metastasis?
Love it, Ronny!
Thanks for the great article, and all the references too. Keep up the good work.
My concern with CT scans is the huge amount of radiation for each one. From what I read each CT scan is worth about 10 chest x-rays. I would rather do MRI’s. Opinions?
I’ve always been told the radiation from a single scan is not that great. And you would need to do a lot of scans go over the limit. MRIs strengths are the brain, the liver, and bones/muscles. It’s not so great for other organs. So there’s pros and cons Pam.
Here’s a great resource which explains dosage. http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray